Adobe warns over unpatched PDF peril

Monday, June 7, 2010

Hackers are exploiting critical, unpatched vulnerabilities in Adobe Reader, Acrobat and Flash Player.

The zero-day vulnerabilities are platform independent and can affect users of Adobe products regardless of whether they run Windows, Mac or Linux systems, Adobe warns.

The software developer reckons that Adobe Reader and Acrobat version 8.x are not vulnerable, but users of the newer version 9.0 of the software are at risk. Adobe has published a workaround involving the deletion of a library file connected with processing Flash content in PDF files pending the development of a more comprehensive fix.

Adobe is yet to publish a timetable of when patches will become available. Adobe Flash Player 10.0.45.2 and earlier versions are vulnerable to the bug. Users of Flash Player 10.1 Release Candidate may be in the clear but that's uncertain, as an advisory from Adobe explains.

The bugs are the latest in a series of security pratfalls to befall Adobe software, joint favourite with Microsoft's browser and applications as the main targets of hacker attacks. The latest flaw can be blamed on the support of exotic files and formats within PDF files, a problem that has cropped up in the past.

Facebook back in Bangladesh

Facebook is back in Bangladesh after blocking access to pages depicting the prophet Mohammed and apologising to country's telecoms authorities.

The site also excised what Bangladeshi authorities described as "obnoxious" images of the country's government and opposition leaders.

The social networking site was locked out of the 150 million-strong mainly Muslim Bangladesh after a storm over the "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day" group. Depictions of the prophet are considered blasphemous by Muslims.

Bangladesh swiftly followed regional neighbour Pakistan's response to the page, and threw up digital barricades against the social networking site.

After the best part of a week, access was restored on Saturday once Facebook removed the offending page and apologised. It also begged forgiveness for what the Bangladeshi authorities described as the "obnoxious" images of the country's political leaders.

While Facebook can make the case that it was responding to widespread sentiment on the issue of the Mohammed pictures, it will be interesting to see how it spins caving in on the issue of anti-government caricatures.

India's Daily News and Analysis site reported that a Bangladeshi youth was quickly arrested for the "obnoxious" images, and held for a court-ordered "interrogation".

According to one report, Facebook CSO Joe Sullivan told the authorities: I look forward to learning more about your local standards and working together to promote safe use of Facebook in Bangladesh."

One way of using Facebook safely might be to refrain from criticising political leaders.

The authorities will continue to "monitor" Facebook for offensive content. Surely another ban or spate of blocking is just a matter of time.

YourArcadeScript "username" Parameter SQL Injection

YourArcadeScript is a PHP-based web application. The application is exposed to an SQL injection issue because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied data to the "username" parameter of the "includes/saveregister.php" script before using it in an SQL query. YourArcadeScript version 2.0b1 is affected.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40459/references

10.23.61 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

Toronja CMS Multiple SQL Injection Vulnerabilities

Toronja CMS is a PHP-based content management system. The application is exposed to multiple SQL injection issues because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied data to the "ncategoria1" parameter of the "index.php" and "interior.php" scripts before using it in an SQL query.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40421

10.23.56 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

New 'Twilight' book raises fears of PDF attacks

The release of a new novella in the popular 'Twilight' series could spark a malware outbreak, say security experts.

Security vendor PC Tools issued a warning to users in advance of the release of author Stephenie Meyer's new title "The Short Second Life of Bree Tanner." A digital version of the book is scheduled to be released on the web 7 June.

The company warned that the 'Twilight' author's latest release could find its way onto the web as a PDF file which could be compromised by malware writers to contain malicious Javascript code and infect users with malware.

PC Tools said that the threat of 'poisoned' e-book files has increased with the growth of reader tablets and other devices which can be used to read digital titles.

"They will exploit the online searches to find ways to infect computers with malware and new threats," the company said.

"Eager fans searching for early sneak peeks will also be targeted."

The company is recommending that users only download the title from trusted sources, scan all downloads before launching and be wary supposed e-books which come as executable files.

Copyright v3.co.uk


U.S. Intelligence Analyst Arrested in Wikileaks Video Probe

Federal officials have arrested an Army intelligence analyst who boasted of giving classified U.S. combat video and hundreds of thousands of classified State Department records to whistleblower site Wikileaks, Wired.com has learned.

SPC Bradley Manning, 22, of Potomac, Maryland, was stationed at Forward Operating Base Hammer, 40 miles east of Baghdad, where he was arrested nearly two weeks ago by the Army’s Criminal Investigation Division. A family member says he’s being held in custody in Kuwait, and has not been formally charged.

Manning was turned in late last month by a former computer hacker with whom he spoke online. In the course of their chats, Manning took credit forleaking a headline-makingvideo of a helicopter attack thatWikileaks posted online in April. The video showed a deadly 2007 U.S.helicopter air strike in Baghdad that claimed the lives of several innocentcivilians.

He said he also leaked three other items to Wikileaks: a separate videoshowing the notorious 2009 Garani air strike in Afghanistan that Wikileakshas previously acknowledged is in its possession; a classified Army documentevaluatingWikileaks as a security threat, which the site posted in March; and apreviously unreported breach consisting of 260,000 classified U.S.diplomatic cables that Manning described as exposing “almost criminal political back dealings.”

“Hillary Clinton, and several thousand diplomats around the world are going to have a heart attack when they wake up one morning, and find an entire repository of classified foreign policy is available, in searchable format, to the public,” Manning wrote.

Wired.com could not confirm whether Wikileaks received the supposed 260,000 classified embassy dispatches. To date, a single classified diplomatic cable has appeared on the site: released last February, it describes a U.S. embassy meeting with the government of Iceland. E-mail and a voice mail message left for Wikileaks founder Julian Assange on Sunday were not answered by the time this article was published.

The State Department said it was not aware of the arrest or the allegedly leaked cables. The FBI was not prepared to comment when asked about Manning.

Army spokesman Gary Tallman was unaware of the investigation but said, “If you have a security clearance and wittingly or unwittingly provide classified info to anyone who doesn’t have security clearance or a need to know, you have violated security regulations and potentially the law.”

Manning’s arrest comes as Wikileaks has ratcheted up pressure against various governments over the years with embarrassing documents acquired through a global whistleblower network that is seemingly impervious to threats from adversaries. Its operations are hosted on servers in several countries, and it uses high-level encryption for its document submission process, providing secure anonymity for its sources and a safe haven from legal repercussions for itself. Since its launch in 2006, it has never outed a source through its own actions, either voluntarily or involuntarily.

Manning came to the attention of the FBI and Army investigators after he contacted former hacker Adrian Lamo late last month over instant messenger and e-mail. Lamo had just been the subject of a Wired.com article. Veryquickly in his exchange with the ex-hacker, Manning claimed to be the Wikileaks videoleaker.

“If you had unprecedented access to classified networks 14 hours a day 7 days a week for 8+ months, what would you do?” Manning asked.

Bradley Manning (Facebook.com)

From the chat logs provided by Lamo, and examined by Wired.com, it appears Manning senseda kindred spirit in the ex-hacker. He discussed personal issues that got himinto trouble with his superiors and left him socially isolated, and said hehad been demoted and was headed for an early discharge from the Army.

When Manning told Lamo that he leaked a quarter-million classified embassy cables, Lamo contacted the Army, and then met with Army CID investigators and the FBI at a Starbucks near his house in Carmichael, California, where he passed the agents a copy of the chat logs. At their second meeting with Lamo on May 27, FBI agents from the Oakland Field Office told the hacker that Manning had been arrested the day before in Iraq by Army CID investigators.

Lamo has contributed funds to Wikileaks in the past, and says he agonized over the decision to expose Manning — he says he’s frequently contacted by hackers who want to talk about their adventures, and he’s never considered reporting anyone before. The supposed diplomatic cable leak, however, made him believe Manning’s actions were genuinely dangerous to U.S. national security.

“I wouldn’t have done this if lives weren’t in danger,” says Lamo, whodiscussed the details with Wired.com following Manning’s arrest. “He was in a war zone and basically trying to vacuum up as much classified information as he could, and just throwing it up into the air.”

Manning told Lamo that he enlisted in the Army in 2007 and held a TopSecret/SCI clearance, details confirmed by his friends and family members. He claimed to have been rummaging through classified military and government networks for more than a year and said that the networks contained “incredible things, awful things … that belonged in the public domain, and not on some server stored in a dark room in Washington DC.”

He first contacted Wikileaks’ Julian Assange sometime around late November last year, he claimed, after Wikileaks posted 500,000 pager messagescovering a 24-hour period surrounding the September 11, 2001 terror attacks.”I immediately recognized that they were from an NSA database, and I feltcomfortable enough to come forward,” he wrote toLamo. He said his role with Wikileaks was “a source, not quite a volunteer.”

Manning had already been sifting through the classified networks for monthswhen he discovered the Iraq video in late 2009, he said. The video, laterreleased by Wikileaks under the title “Collateral Murder,” shows a 2007Army helicopter attack on a group of men, someof whom were armed, that the soldiers believed were insurgents. The attackkilled two Reuters employees and an unarmed Baghdad man who stumbled on thescene afterward and tried to rescue one of the wounded by pulling him intohis van. The man’s two children were in the van and suffered seriousinjuries in the hail of gunfire.

“At first glance it was just a bunch of guys getting shot up by ahelicopter,” Manning wrote of the video. “No big deal … about two dozenmore where that came from, right? But something struck me as odd with thevan thing, and also the fact it was being stored in a JAG officer’sdirectory. So I looked into it.”

In January, while on leave in the U.S., Manning visited a close friend inBoston and confessed he’d gotten his hands on unspecified sensitiveinformation, and was weighing leaking it, according to the friend. “Hewanted to do the right thing,” says 20-year-old Tyler Watkins. “That wassomething I think he was struggling with.”

Manning passed the video to Wikileaks in February, he told Lamo. After April 5 when the video was released and made headlines Manning contacted Watkins from Iraq asking him about the reaction in the U.S.

“He would message me, Are people talking about it?… Are the media saying anything?,” Watkins said. “That was one of his major concerns, that once he had done this, was it really going to make a difference?… He didn’t want to do this just to cause a stir. … He wanted people held accountable and wanted to see this didn’t happen again.”

Watkins doesn’t know what else Manning might have sent to Wikileaks. But in his chats with Lamo, Manning took credit for a number of other disclosures.

The second video he claimed to have leaked shows a May 2009 air strike near Garani village in Afghanistan that the local government says killed nearly 100 civilians, most of them children. The Pentagon released a report about the incident last year, but backed down froma plan to show video of the attack to reporters.

As described by Manning in his chats with Lamo, his purported leaking was made possible by lax security online and off.

Manning had access to two classified networks from two separate securedlaptops: SIPRNET, the Secret-level network used by the Department of Defenseand the State Department, and the Joint Worldwide IntelligenceCommunications System which serves both agencies at the Top Secret/SCIlevel.

The networks, he said, were both “air gapped” from unclassified networks, but the environment at the base made it easy to smuggle data out.

“I would come in with music on a CD-RW labeled with something like ‘Lady Gaga’, erase the music then write a compressed split file,” he wrote. “No one suspected a thing and, odds are, they never will.”

“[I] listened and lip-synced to Lady Gaga’s ‘Telephone’ while exfiltratingpossibly the largest data spillage in American history,” he added later.”Weak servers, weak logging, weak physical security, weakcounter-intelligence, inattentive signal analysis… a perfectstorm.”

Manning told Lamo that the Garani video was leftaccessiblein a directoryon a U.S. Central Command server, centcom.smil.mil, by officers whoinvestigated the incident. The video, he said, was an encrypted AES-256 ZIPfile.

Manning’s aunt, with whom he lived in the U.S., had heard nothing about hisarrest when first contacted by Wired.com last week; Debra Van Alstyne said she last saw Manning during his leave in January and they had discussed his plans to enroll in college when his four-year stint in the Army was set to end in October 2011. She described him as smart and seemingly untroubled, with a natural talent for computers and a keen interest in global politics.

She said she became worried about her nephew recently after he disappeared from contact. Then Manning finally called Van Alstyne collect on Saturday. He told her that he was okay, but that he couldn’t discuss what was going on, Van Alstyne said. He then gave her his Facebook password and asked her to post a message on his behalf.

The message reads: “Some of you may have heard that I have been arrested for disclosure of classified information to unauthorized persons. SeeCollateralMurder.com.”

Ex-hacker Adrian Lamo (Ariel Zambelich/Wired.com)

An Army defense attorney then phoned Van Alstyne on Sunday and said Manningis being held in protective custody in Kuwait. “He hasn’t seen the case file, but he does understand that it does have to do with that CollateralMurder video,” Van Alstyne said.

Manning’s father said Sunday that he’s shocked by his son’s arrest.

“I was in the military for 5 years,” said Brian Manning, of Oklahoma. “I had a Secret clearance, and I never divulged any information in 30 years since I got out about what I did. And Brad has always been very, very tight at adhering to the rules. Even talking to him after boot camp and stuff, he kept everything so close that he didn’t open up to anything.”

His son, he added, is “a good kid. Never been in trouble. Never been on
drugs, alcohol, nothing.”

Lamo says he felt he had no choice but to turn in Manning, but that he’s now concerned about the soldier’s status and well-being. The FBI hasn’t told Lamo what charges Manning may face, if any.

The agents did tell Lamo that he may be asked to testify against Manning. The Bureau was particularly interested in information that Manning gave Lamo about an apparently-classified military cybersecurity matter, Lamo said.

That seemed to be the least interesting information to Manning, however. What seemed to excite him most in his chats, was his supposed leaking of the embassy cables. He anticipated returning to the states after his early discharge, and watching from the sidelines as his action bared the secret history of U.S. diplomacy around the world.

“Everywhere there’s a U.S. post, there’s a diplomatic scandal that will be revealed,” Manning wrote. “It’s open diplomacy. World-wide anarchy in CSV format. It’s Climategate witha global scope, and breathtaking depth. It’s beautiful, and horrifying.”


First US cybersecurity general plans online rules of engagement

The commander of US Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM), General Keith Alexander has used his first public speech to detail his unit's plans in the event in the event of an online attack.

Alexander said that (USCYBERCOM), which was set up to coordinate the Department of Defence (DOD) computer systems, was formulating two sets of rules of engagement for attack online by foreign powers, similar to those followed by other arms of the military.

“We should assume that foreign government actors in cyberspace have both considerably more resources and even more worrisome, motivations, than cybercriminals.”

“In short, we face a dangerous combination of known and unknown vulnerabilities, strong adversary capabilities and weak situational awareness.”

The DOD has more than 7 million machines to protect, linked in 15,000 networks with 21 satellite gateways and 20,000 commercial circuits composed of countless devices and components, and were probed by unauthorized users approximately 250,000 times an hour, over 6 million times a day he said.

He said it would take the support of private enterprise to help support and protect the network and USCYBERCOM was recruiting the teams to do the job.

“Cybersecurity is a team sport. We can’t do this alone,” he said.

During the Q&A session of the speech at the Center for Strategic & International Studies, a private research group in Washington Alexander was asked about the security implications of Ipv6. The bulk of US systems still use IPv4 and many have pointed out this could pose a long term security risk.

“I think there’s a lot of folks looking at the transition from IPv4 to 6. I think it’s something that we will have to do at some point, the question of security,” he said.

“I think that’s still open for discussion, but clearly you’re going to have to take some of the benefits of IPv6, the addressing and other things.”

When asked where he stood on the role of privacy in cybersecurity Alexander, who is also head of the NSA, said oversight by all three arms of government was strong and he believed that the law was not being broken.

“Some say the Constitution is not a suicide pact, and I agree, but it’s also not something that we’re just going to throw out our civil liberties and privacy,” he concluded.

“We were built on that. that’s how our country was built. We want to ensure that we do our part to it. My responsibility, as the director of NSA, is to ensure that what we do comports with law.”

Copyright v3.co.uk


Zombie PCs to be throttled, isolated under new ISP code

Voluntary ISP code of practice launched for Cyber Security Awareness week.

Internet service providers should quarantine or even slow down the connections of customers with infected computers, according to a new Australian industry code of practice.

The voluntary code of practice was designed by the Federal Government and the Internet Industry Association (IIA) to formalise cyber security standards for ISPs and customers.

The code [PDF] outlines measures to educate customers, detect malicious activity on the network, take action against compromisde customers and also a requirement to report serious activity to the Australian Federal Police and the national computer emergency response team (CERT).

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy announced the code at yesterday's launch of Australian Cyber Security Awareness Week, and hinted that the code might not remain 'voluntary' should ISPs not sign up.

"At the moment we're working with [IIA CEO Peter Coroneos] and the industry, to make it work this way," Mr Conroy said. "Down the track if it doesn't work - [compulsory adherence to the code] is something we'll have to look at.

"But we are genuienly working well with the sector to get the best outcome."

The code is built around a free monitoring service introduced by the Australian communications and media authority (ACMA) in 2005 -- Australian Internet Security Initiative -- which is used by 78 ISPs to detect whether their customers' computers are connected to a network of hacked PCs, known as a botnet.

The government and IIA have added several resources for ISPs including standard cyber security education messages, notification guidelines, a requirement to report significant infections to the authorities and courses of action to reduce a threat.

The recommended courses of action include the option to slow down or limit a customer's connection.

"Actions that ISPs can take when they become aware of a compromised computer include... apply an ‘abuse' plan where the customer's internet service is speed throttled," the code recommends.

"Temporarily quarantining the customer's service, for example by holding them within a ‘walled garden' with links to relevant resources that will assist them until they are able to restore the security of their machine."

These two measures are more relaxed than suggestions made in a draft of the code in September last year, which recommended ISPs cut access to zombie-infected PCs altogether.

The code states that "user privacy is paramount", but does not provide details for how this will be protected if a compromised computer is reported to authorities.

The ISP code is policed by the IIA and there are no penalties for breaches, according to IIA CEO Peter Coroneos.

"It goes around the compliance symbol," Mr Coroneos said. "They'll be given a trust mark that they put on their website that shows that their code is compliant.

"If we become aware down the track in the unlikely event that an ISP is going to stop acting in their best interests, then we'll take action." 


AFP demands Facebook offer "one click" police alarm

AFP confident Facebook will hire a police compliance officer.

Facebook could have a local police point of presence within months, according to Australian Federal Police High Tech Crime Centre assistant commissioner Neil Gaughan.

The move would eliminate a sticking point in a high-profile slanging match between the two organisations, after the AFP questioned Facebook's willingness to co-operate with local police investigations.

Gaughan told iTnews that relations between the pair improved last week when he was in the United States at the behest of the Department of Justice to discuss the cooperation issue.

"It's not as if we haven't been in consultation with Facebook - but after the meeting the approach was made to me to engage again, a further engagement," Gaughan said.

He described the relationship with social networking website Facebook as "a work in progress" but said the two lengthy discussions were "very, very fruitful".

"I have requested an international law enforcement presence here in Australia, a point of contact," he said.

"We need to look forward to how we can make it easier for people to report their concerns on content service providers, so something like a report button is something I would be looking to achieve in the future.

"I'd like to think in six months time we'd be in a position where we have one of those two things in place."

Last week, the U.S. Department Of Justice convened parties in New York to discuss concerns that content service providers did not sufficiently co-operate with international law enforcement. The meeting was also attended by respresentatives of the FBI, US immigration customers enforcement agency, the UK's child explotation and online protection centre, Interpol, and the Royal Canadian mounted police.

"We came up with some strategies about how we believe as a group we can work together to exert some pressure on the content service providers to assist law enforcement to gain better activity and better approach for them," Mr Gaughan said.

"I want to emphasise it wasn't just Facebook [discussed]."

Mr Gaughan expects the meeting will take place again in the future and hopes that content service providers are involved.


Experts warn of malicious Twitter spam

Over 50,000 instances of latest threat, vendor claims.

Security researchers are warning of yet another Twitter-themed malicious spam attack that attempts to install rogue antivirus software on the victim’s PC.

Websense Security Labs ThreatSeeker Network said the spam emails are designed to imitate a Twitter Password Reset Notification message.

The spam contains a link to a compromised web site that, when clicked or pasted into the browser, prompts the user to download a malicious executable named password.exe, said the firm.

This executable turns out to be a rogue AV called Protection Center Safebrowser. It has been architected to appear like genuine anti virus software by alerting the user that it has discovered malicious files on the deskptop.

“What distinguishes this rogue anti virus campaign from others we have seen is that it displays on your desktop some of the malicious files it installs,” said Carl Leonard, senior research manager at Websense security labs.

“This makes the attack notification more believable. A business seriously needs to consider a solution that will provide it with real time security in order to mitigate the threat of the modern day cyber criminal.”

The security vendor said it has seen around 55,000 instances of this malicious spam email so far.

Copyright v3.co.uk


Hack on e-commerce co. exposes records for 200,000

Saturday, June 5, 2010

E-commerce company Digital River exposed data belonging to almost 200,000 individuals after hackers executed a highly unusual search command against its secured servers, according to a news report.

The breach came to light only after a 19-year-old New York man allegedly tried to sell the purloined data for as much as $500,000, The Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported Friday. After Eric Porat made repeated attempts to persuade a company called Media Breakaway to buy the information, company officials alerted their counterparts at Digital River, the paper reported, citing court documents. A federal grand jury is investigating the matter with help from the FBI.

The data contained names, email addresses, websites, and unique user-identification numbers for 198,398 individuals. It was originally gathered by affiliated marketing companies using software offered by Digital Rivers subsidiary Direct Response Technologies and stored on password-protected servers.

It was stolen in late January using a highly unusual search command. The report didn't elaborate.

Porat, who lives at home with his parents, allegedly claimed to offer the data to the highest bidder. He told the CEO of Media Breakaway he obtained it from a former Digital River consultant, who managed to siphon it off the servers when security systems were taken down temporarily.

Orders filed under seal last month block Porat from selling, destroying, altering, or distributing the data. Documents in the case were unsealed on Wednesday, but court documents weren't available online at time of writing.

Appeals court absolves firm that exposed man's SSN

A man whose social security number and other personal data were exposed by a company that processed his job application has no legal claims because no actual damage resulted from the privacy breach, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The decision, issued late last week by the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals, is likely to make life more difficult for people suing Facebook and other companies in California for not adequately protecting user information. It upheld a lower court ruling that said the mere possibility of damage and the cost of monitoring credit reports didn't count as the harm needed to bring a lawsuit under laws in the state.

The case arose from the theft of one or more laptops from Vangent, a company that processed job applications for clothing retailer The Gap. We're guessing it's the same mega breach The Gap reported in late 2007 warning that sensitive information for more than 800,000 individuals was exposed when laptops with unencrypted contents were stolen.

Applicant Joel Ruiz sued the two companies for a raft of violations, including negligence, breach of contract, unfair competition and invasion of privacy. But the federal judge hearing the case rejected each cause of action on the grounds the plaintiff failed to state actual damages that resulted from the breach.

No one can doubt that those individuals whose private information was potentially exposed by the theft of the laptop have reason to be aggrieved and concerned, the three-judge panel for the appeals court wrote in its decision. However, the sole question for us is whether the district court properly analyzed the legal claims raised by Ruiz. We conclude that it did.

The ruling largely echoes decisions by other courts, including a case against online prescription drug processor Express Scripts, which leaked highly sensitive subscriber information. Under the statutes invoked in the cases, plaintiffs were required to show actual damage arising from the breaches, rather than the speculation, however well founded, that they are more susceptible to harm, the courts have in essence ruled.

Last week's decision is evidence that appeals courts are inclined to agree with that reasoning. And according to The Technology & Marketing Law Blog that isn't likely to fare well for two separate lawsuits pending against Facebook for sharing users' personal information with advertisers despite assurances such information would never be shared without explicit permission.

Both of these lawsuits allege that Facebook improperly disclosed the user name and other information of Facebook users who accessed content on the web, blogger Venkat Balasubramani wrote. Claims in both lawsuits are premised around Facebook's violation of its privacy policy. As this case makes clear, the plaintiffs in these cases are unlikely to be able to show actual damages, and their breach of contract, negligence, and unfair competition claims are likely dead on arrival.

The virtual immunity companies have when they lose your data is worth remembering the next time one of them makes solemn promises that your data is safe with them. They may sound assuring, but when push comes to shove, they don't mean very much. Just ask Joel Ruiz.

Panda soups up freebie cloud anti-virus

Panda Security has improved the functionality of its free cloud-based anti-malware service and launched a new commercial version, Panda Cloud Antivirus Pro.

The paid-for version, which costs from $29.95, offers expanded support and automation.

Panda said nearly 10 million users have used Panda Cloud Antivirus (the free version) since its launch last year. The latest version of the software, released Thursday, features a configurable behaviour blocker.

The free version offers an alternative to the likes of AVG, Avast Free Antivirus and Microsoft's Security Essentials for consumers looking for basic anti-malware protection without paying.

The technology uses a cloud-based architecture to collect and processing malware samples, rather than traditional server-based signature updates. As a result the technology is much less of a memory hog, taking up 15MB of RAM, compared with 60MB for traditional signature-based anti-virus products.

Panda adds that its Collective Intelligence technology is more nimble in quickly responding to new malware threats.

Drupal False Account Detector Module Multiple Cross-Site Scripting and SQL Injection Vulnerabilities

Friday, June 4, 2010

The False Account Detector module for Drupal gives sites the ability to localize content. The module is exposed to multiple unspecified cross-site scripting and SQL injection issues because the application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input related to received cookies.

Ref: http://drupal.org/node/803728

10.22.100 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application

ConPresso CMS "firma.php" SQL Injection

ConPresso CMS is a PHP-based content management system. The application is exposed to an SQL injection issue because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied input to the "id" parameter of the "firma.php" script. ConPresso version 4.0.7 is affected.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40335

10.22.75 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

Debliteck DBCMS "section.php" SQL Injection

Debliteck DBCMS is a PHP-based content manager. The application is exposed to an SQL injection issue because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied input to the "id" parameter of the "section.php" script before using it in an SQL query.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40259

10.22.70 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

cyberhost "default.asp" SQL Injection

cyberhost is an ASP-based domain and sales hosting application. The application is exposed to an SQL injection issue because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied data to the "id" parameter of the "default.asp" script before using it in an SQL query.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40357/references

10.22.80 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

Facebook plugs email address indexing bug

Incident-prone social network monolith Facebook has plugged yet another security leak, this time involving the indexing by search engines of email addresses not listed on Facebook.

Thousands of email addresses submitted using Facebook's "Find a friend" feature that were not tied to a Facebook account wound up getting indexed by Google, according to Blogger Cory Watilo, who was among those affected.

"One obvious problem is that spammers can easily scrape this data and add easily legitimate address to their lists, many of whom might not give their addresses to Facebook for a reason," Watilo writes.

The issue sparked a lively discussion thread on Hacker News.

Facebook changed its robot.txt file to prevent the search engine from indexing the relevant "opt out of emails from Facebook" page so that email address data can no longer be harvested by spammers or other miscreants.

However, it told the AllFacebook blog that that its actions were only a precaution and that the email address exposure resulted from users inadvisedly published their own addresses on mailing lists rather than a fault on its part.

We are investigating this situation but in cases we have identified, Facebook users have republished e-mails from Facebook elsewhere on the Internet, making public their own e-mail addresses. In some instances, these venues have been personal blogs or public mailing list archives such as Yahoo Groups. As a precaution, we have stopped indexing these pages in Google but cannot control users who choose to republish their e-mails in blogs or mailing list archives.

Security experts are unsure of the root cause of the problem in this case, but the snafu represents the latest in a long line of security snafus involving the site over recent weeks - a factor that means many are disinclined to give it the benefit of the doubt.

Over recent days many Facebook users have been hit by a run of clickjacking attacks, taking advantage of the social network's "Like" facility. The ruse results in users endorsing a page as something they like without necessarily realising they are recommending it to all of their Facebook friends and contacts.

A fortnight ago Facebook admitted that it mistakenly gave advertisers data that might be used to discover users' names and locations, contrary to its privacy policy. MySpace made much the same error which resulted from coding errors in failing to obscure the URL of the user's profile page before handing over reports to advertisers.

In the last month the social network has also grappled with a flaw that created a means for hackers to delete Facebook friends, and a bug that allowed users to eavesdrop on IM chats, forcing the social network to suspend the feature while it applied a fix.

That's just a sample of the security problems affecting Facebook since the start of May alone and ignores the privacy controversies brewing since the December privacy roll-back. These were made worse by more recent plans to share users' details with selected third-party sites that forced the site to simplify its privacy controls last week.

MS lines up 10 bulletins for bumper Patch Tuesday

Microsoft is lining up a bumper load of 10 security bulletins covering 34 vulnerabilities for June's Patch Tuesday release.

Three of the 10 bulletins, due on 8 June, cover critical flaws, normally defined as security holes that might allow an attacker to take full control of the targeted machine. The other seven notices fall in the lesser category of important and deal with bugs in Windows and Office.

The critical vulnerabilities affect all supported version of Windows (including Windows 7) and Internet Explorer.

"The June release is a large update and will keep system administrators busy, even if they have migrated to Windows 7 already," explained Wolfgang Kandek, CTO of Qualys.

The updates are due to cover two unpatched vulnerabilities in SharePoint (KB983438) and an information leakage bug in Internet Explorer (KB980088), he added.

More details will come with the release of the patches on Tuesday.

In the meantime, Microsoft's pre-release bulletin can be found here.

An overview from SANS Internet Storm Centre can be found here.

Mac users warned about spyware from free apps

Spyware downloaded during installation.

Mac security firm Intego has warned of a spyware application that is installed by a number of freely distributed Mac applications and screensavers found on a variety of websites.

The spyware, classified as OSX/OpinionSpy, performs a number of malicious actions from scanning files to recording user activity, as well as sending information about this activity to remote servers and opening a backdoor on infected Macs.

It claimed that OSX/OpinionSpy is installed by a number of applications and screensavers that are distributed on sites such as MacUpdate, VersionTracker and Softpedia. The spyware itself is not contained in these applications, but is downloaded during the installation process.

The malware is believed to have existed for Windows since 2008 and claims to collect browsing and purchasing information that is used in market reports.

However, it performs actions such as: running as root with full rights to access and to change any file on the infected user's computer; opening an HTTP backdoor using port 8254; scanning all accessible volumes; analysing files and packets entering and leaving the infected Mac over a local network; and analysing data coming from and being sent to other computers. This led to Intego classifying it as spyware.

Intego also claimed that it injects code, without user intervention, into Safari, Firefox and iChat and copies personal data from these applications and regularly sends data, in encrypted form, to a number of servers using ports 80 and 443.

The dangers, according to Intego, are that the application that purports to collect information for marketing reasons does much more, going as far as scanning all the files on an infected Mac.

Intego said: “Users have no way of knowing exactly what data is collected and sent to remote servers; such data may include user names, passwords, credit card numbers and more. The risk of this data being collected and used without users' permission makes this spyware particularly dangerous to users' privacy.

“The fact that this application collects data in this manner, and that it opens a backdoor, makes it a very serious security threat. In addition, the risk of it collecting sensitive data such as user names, passwords and credit card numbers, makes this a very high-risk spyware. While its distribution is limited, we warn Mac users to pay careful attention to which software they download and install.”

In an update, it said that it had been monitoring the actions of the different versions it has found of this spyware, and discovered that after a certain time the spyware makes an ‘upgrade' and installs another application. This is another variant of the same spyware, called PermissionResearch, while it is also possible that further versions of this spyware will upgrade themselves to other variants.

Veracode vice president EMEA Matt Peachey said: “The reactive security of detecting malware after it has reached a critical mass is a failed model on Windows PCs. Moving the same technology to new platforms such as OSX or mobile as they come under malware attacks will only lead to the same morass of malware.

“A new model of only downloading and installing software that has passed a third party verification is a solution that can keep malware off these platforms.”

Jason Steer, EMEA solution architect at Veracode, also questioned why Mac applications and software development would be any less secure than Windows.

“The state of software report hints that the statistics on open source and commercial applications are both some way short of the mark. I think the story is less about malware and more to do with secure coding and third party clearing houses for applications in future to build trust," he said.

See original article on scmagazineuk.com

Secure Computing Magazine


FTC strikes deal with keylogger vendor

CyberSpy promises to go legit with RemoteSpy tool.

The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has agreed to settle a case with the vendor of a popular keylogging tool.

The Commission said that the deal will settle its suit with CyberSpy Software. The company and its owner had been accused of pushing the RemoteSpy keylogger as an "undetectable" tool which could be disguised as another type of file and used to gather data without the target's knowledge.

Under the terms of the deal, CyberSpy will agree to remove all legacy versions of the keylogging tool currently running and inform users that improper use of the RemoteSpy software could be a crime. The company will also closely manage data obtained from the tool through encrypted connections.

Additionally, the company agreed to stop providing users with instructions on how to hide the file as an email attachment or document file and keep close tabs on affiliates to make sure that the product is not being touted as a tool for performing illegal activities.

The deal will settle a suit that the FTC filed in a Florida District Court in 2008. CyberSpy Software will not be forced to admit its guilt in the case.

Copyright v3.co.uk


Rash of Facebook 'likejacks' still flaring

Facebook attacks that force users to unwittingly endorse scam pages keep spreading, researchers say.

When the exploits surfaced on Tuesday, they resulted in hundreds of thousands of users giving their thumbs up to links with titles including: "LOL This girl gets OWNED after a POLICE OFFICER reads her STATUS MESSAGE." Since then, similar attacks have circulated that cause users to recommend pages promising naked pictures of alternative rock diva Hayley Williams or the phone number of heart-throb singer Justin Bieber.

The attacks exploit a flaw present in virtually every browser that allows unscrupulous webmasters to control the links a visitor clicks on. They work by overlaying an invisible iframe or other web object on top of a link or blank space on a webpage. The result is that a user can never be sure he's clicking on the link or button he thinks he is. The exploit has been coined clickjacking by Jeremiah Grossman and Robert RSnake Hansen, the security researchers who brought the technique to public awareness in late 2008.

So far, there are no reports that the Facebook attacks amount to much more than pranks that cause users to click a Like button that recommends a link to their friends. But it's not inconceivable that the likejacking exploits could be used in much the way black-hat search engine optimization is used to lure people to websites that try to install malware on their machines.

There's only so much Facebook can do to stop the exploits since the actual clickjacking takes place on websites controlled by the attackers. Still, engineers could probably do better at isolating and then blocking the users or bots that are perpetuating the scam. Until then, remember that the number of Likes an ad or other piece of content boast on Facebook is largely meaningless.

Lawyers Claim Google Wi-Fi Sniffing Is Not an Accident

Lawyers suing Google claimed Thursday they have discovered evidence in a patent application that Google deliberately programmed its Street View cars to collect private data from open Wi-Fi networks, despite claims to the contrary

“At this point, it is our belief that it is not an accident,” said Brooks Cooper, an Oregon attorney suing Google in one of several class actions lawsuits around the country arising from Google’s disclosure that its Street View cars intercepted Wi-Fi traffic around the world. Google has described the sniffing as a mistaken coding error.

The evidence, the relevance of which Google disputed Thursday, is a 2008 Google patent application (.pdf) describing amethod to increase the accuracy of location-based services — services that would allow advertisers or others to know the almost exact location of a mobile phone or other computing device. The patent application involves intercepting data and analyzing the timing of their transmission as part of the method for pinpointing user locations.

The so-called “776″ patent application,publishedby U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in January, describes “one or more of the methods” by which Google collects information for its Street View program, Cooper’s legal team said in court documents filed late Wednesday in Oregon federal court.

Google spokeswoman Christine Chen said in an e-mail that the patent in question “is entirely unrelated to the software code used to collect Wi-Fi information with Street View cars.” In a follow up e-mail, Chen added that Google files “patent applications on a variety of ideas that our engineers come up with. Some of them mature into real products or services and some of them don’t.”

Chen did not immediately respond to an e-mail asking whether Google has performed the “776″ method in practice.

Whether Google willfully sniffed out internet traffic on unsecured Wi-Fi hotspots in dozens of countries is an enormous public relations headache. It also carries huge legal and monetary ramifications in the United States, where the Mountain View-based internet giant is being sued for privacy violations in multiple federal courthouses.

Among other reasons, Google might escape liability if it accidentally collected and never divulged the data, which includes web pages users visited or pieces of e-mail, video, audio and document files.

Google must turn over the U.S. data it siphoned to an Oregon federal judge by Friday. The data will remain under lock and key.

Street View is part of Google Maps and Google Earth, and provides panoramic pictures of streets and their surroundings across the globe.

The Mountain View-based internet giant has maintained the collection of data was inadvertent the result of a programming error with code written for an early experimental project that wound up on the Street View code. Google said it didn’t realize it was sniffing packets of data on unsecured Wi-Fi networks in dozens of countries for the last three years until German privacy authorities began questioning what data Google’s Street View cameras were collecting.

Photo: Byrion/Flickr

See Also:

  • Pentagon Wants Cyborg Insects to Sniff WMD, Offer Free Wi-Fi …
  • SSL Gmail Not As Safe As You Thought UPDATED
  • Fed Blotter: New York Coder Charged With Helping TJ Maxx Hacker …
  • FBI Agents Hunt for Comcast Hijackers

Google tries to patent tech that snoops Wi-Fi networks

Google is attempting to patent the very same wardriving technology the search giant says it used by mistake to snoop on Wi-Fi users in more than 30 countries, attorneys said Wednesday.

A patent application published in January describes a method devised by Google for gathering and analyzing data sent via wireless access points. The application says the device "may be placed in a vehicle and data may be obtained continuously or at predetermined time increments" and that the speed of the vehicle "may be factored into the analysis," according to lawyers suing Google on behalf of people whose traffic may have been collected by the technology.

Google was not entitled to receive the payload data it captured from plaintiffs and class members, the attorneys wrote in an amended complaint filed Wednesday. After Google received, or assisted in receiving the intercepted communications and data, it used the information for its own benefit or for the benefit of another not entitled thereto, in connected with one or more of Google's businesses, location based services, and/or as described in part in Google's United States Patent Application.

Google disclosed the data collection last month, contradicting previous assurances that its Street View cars catalogued SSID and MAC addresses of wireless access points but didn't examine the actual payloads that traveled between them and users connected to them. The company said engineers had mistakenly equipped the cars with experimental software that for three years gathered tiny fragments of data as they traveled over unencrypted Wi-Fi networks.

The amended complaint, one of a handful of lawsuits filed in response to Google's disclosure, appears aimed at countering those claims by arguing the software was well known by company managers considered important enough for them to seek patent protection. The complaint seeks damages of $100,000 for each individual whose data was sniffed.

Of course, Google is a big company, so it's entirely conceivable that patent attorneys in the legal department didn't adequately communicate with engineers deploying Street View cars. But it's going to be harder for the company to claim the Wi-Fi sniffing was the obscure toiling of a handful of employees.

WebAsyst Shop-Script "index.php" SQL Injection

Thursday, June 3, 2010

WebAsyst Shop-Script is a PHP-based web application. The application is exposed to an SQL injection issue because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied input to the "blog_id" parameter of the "index.php" script.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40349

10.22.79 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

Lisk CMS "id" Parameter Multiple Cross-Site Scripting and SQL Injection Vulnerabilities

Lisk CMS is a PHP-based content management application. The application is exposed to multiple issues because it fails to sanitize user-supplied input. Exploiting these issues could allow an attacker to steal cookie-based authentication credentials, control how the site is rendered to the user. Lisk CMS version 4.4 is affected.

Ref: http://www.htbridge.ch/advisory/sql_injection_vulnerability_in_lisk_cms_1.html

10.22.104 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application

MigasCMS "function.php" SQL Injection

MigasCMS is a PHP-based content manager. The application is exposed to an SQL injection issue because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied input to the "categ" parameter of the "function.php" script before using it in an SQL query. MigasCMS version 1.0 is affected.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40256/references

10.22.69 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

Zuckerberg sweats privacy criticism

Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg has again defended his company's privacy policies, this time with added sweat.

The perspiring boy-droid took to the stage at the D8 conference yesterday, where observers said he looked ill at ease facing questions about Facebook's latest PR wobble.

According to the New York Times, Zuckerberg delivered a rambling, uncomfortable performance as he sought to explain how everyone had the wrong end of the stick about his views on personal information. Facebook had been victim of "misperceptions", he said.

"There have been misperceptions that we are trying to make all information open. That's completely false," Zuckerberg insisted in one uncharacteristically concise response.

Last week Facebook announced it would simplify its privacy controls in the face of mounting criticism. It did not however roll back changes that had increased the amount of users' information published to their friends.

Under questioning and hot stage lights Zuckerberg was forced to take off his trademark hoodie. The audience applauded when his interviewer Walt Mossberg changed the subject. It's unclear whether they acted out of sympathy for the sweaty billionaire or concern for their own electrical safety.

Specialized Data Systems Parent Connect Multiple SQL Injection Vulnerabilities

Specialized Data Systems Parent Connect is an ASP-based student reporting application. The application is exposed to multiple SQL injection issues because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied input. These issues affect the "password" field of the application's login page, and the "Link Accounts" form. Parent Connect version 2010.4.11 is affected.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40324

10.22.74 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

FTC slaps down commercial keylogger firm

CyberSpy Software, which markets the controversial RemoteSpy commercial keylogging application, has agreed to rewrite the software and clean up its business practices to settle a case brought by the US Federal Trade Commission.

RemoteSpy was marketed as a 100 per cent undetectable app that might be used to Spy on Anyone. From Anywhere. CyberSpy helpfully provided instructions on how the software might be sent to potential victims disguised as an innocuous application or supposed image in an email attachment.

Following a lawsuit brought by the FTC, CyberSpy is now banned from providing its clients with the means to disguise the product as an innocent file or email attachment. CyberSpy was also ordered by a US district court in Florida to warn potential buyers that misuse of the software may violate wiretapping laws and to remove legacy versions of its software from computers.

RemoteSpy is capable of logging chat conversations, website history, documents opened and keystrokes. RemoteSpy clients would log onto a web site to access harvested information.

Many commercial anti-malware vendors, such as Sunbelt Software, have labelled the application as spyware since it first arrived on the interweb around five years ago. The technology is marketed as "especially perfect for those who want to monitor their employees or children, while away from home or work" although suspicious spouses checking up on partners, unscrupulous private eyes or stalkers might also find the technology useful.

The court order and a statement in the case against CyberSpy can be found on the FTC site here.

A brief history of the 'Botwar'

Symantec's Adrian Covic discusses trends and developments in the fight against botnets.

Back in 2003, security firms saw thousands of PCs infected with the Sobig mass-mailing virus. Later that year, Fizzer malware logged thousands of computers into internet chat rooms.

This was initially perceived only as a problem for IRC (Internet Relay Chat) admins. However, the infected PCs were connected to chat rooms by their human bot-masters, waiting for command and control (C&C) instructions. When MessageLabs Intelligence correlated the malware and spam traffic from each spam sending IP address, the bigger picture was revealed.

Security firms observed botnets to combat their escalating output of spam, but didn't know how to tackle their C&C infrastructure. In 2008, the security community realised the best way to disrupt botnets was to take down the ISPs that hosted them.

The first to go at the end of September 2008 was Intercage (aka Atrivo), linked to the infamous Russian Business Network. The most widely publicised shutdown was McColo, a California-based ISP which was found to deal almost exclusively with cyber gangs. McColo was host to a botnet called Srizbi controlling 1.3 million IP addresses, as well as the Mega-D, Rustock, Asprox, Bobax and Gheg botnets.

In November 2008, community action resulted in McColo's peering ISPs disconnecting it from the internet. Taking down McColo was a shock to botnet gangs. Spam levels dropped instantly by up to 80 per cent.

Srizbi was crippled, never to return and other botnets were badly disrupted. Two months later spam recovered to previous levels, as the surviving botnets relocated their C&C channels and criminals spawned new botnets. Botnet operators were forced to re-evaluate how they functioned and put more protection in place to prevent a repeat of the huge disruption caused by taking down a single ISP.

When Srizbi disappeared, activity from the surviving botnets increased dramatically, seeking to fill the gap left behind. When the next major take-down of a dubious ISP occurred, it was clear cyber criminals had already learned from the strike against McColo.

This time the security community's target was an ISP called 3FN (aka APS Telecom and Pricewert). 3FN hosted C&C channels for Cutwail (aka Pandex). Cutwail, one of the oldest botnets, had been spewing out malware since January 2007 and by June 2009 swelled to over 1.5 million active IP addresses in an aggressive recruitment drive.

3FN was taken down on 5 June, 2009, and Cutwail went with it. But within a few days, Cutwail was back online with a vengeance.

Botnet gangs refined their creations following the McColo takedown.  Now armed with more flexible and robust technology, botnet gangs could review the botnet status and return to business in a few days. Botnets now had a business continuity or disaster recovery plan of their own.

Botnet C&C mechanisms shifted from IRC to HTTP. Algorithms were now built into the bots so they would look for random-looking domain names, which are purchased by the botnet gang each day, and from which bots receive commands. This ensures botnets aren't reliant on one ISP.

Mega-D (aka Ozdok) was one botnet that grew significantly in the wake of the McColo take-down. By November 2009, FireEye broke the algorithms behind the C&C mechanism used to issue the botnet with new instructions. The result was the ability to predict which domain names were going to be used by the botnet and register them in advance of the botnet controllers. It was now possible to know the botnet's next move and to register these domains faster than the botnet controllers.

Mega-D appeared to be crippled. However, a few days later MessageLabs Intelligence identified large volumes of Mega-D spam being distributed from IP addresses that had not been used to send spam previously. This suggested that the botnet controllers had enacted their business continuity plans, seemingly with inactive sleeper bots or a whole parallel backup botnet.

Disaster recovery isn't the only business methodology botnet controllers utilise. They also use a technique called 'fast-flux' hosting, which dynamically distributes resources across a number of continually changing IP addresses using a 'round-robin' style DNS. In the hands of a botnet controller, fast-flux can hide the true location of websites used to host malware, spam and phishing content by hiding them behind the IP addresses of compromised, botnet-controlled computers, each acting as a web server or proxy.


Jewish Chronicle hit by DDoS attack following Gaza flotilla incident

Frequent target for DDoS attacks.

The UK-based Jewish Chronicle was hit by a massive denial-of-service (DoS) attack earlier this week.

Following the Gaza flotilla incident on Monday, a column in the Spectator claimed that the website of the paper was down following "a massive denial-of-service, apparently to shut down its balanced coverage of the Ashdod flotilla incident".

Speaking to SC Magazine, Richard Burton, managing editor of the Jewish Chronicle, confirmed that the attack did occur, and that such attacks happen often.

He said: “We are a target and it is part of our security policy that we understand people want to stop the Jewish voice. It was probably an attempt to silence us on a controversial subject.

“It is usual for us, we have been hacked before and this is a DoS where a lot of IP addresses are hitting our servers at one time. The techies were trying to detect the IP domains and trying to find common denominators.”

He further explained that the website does not get much traffic on a Saturday, but on a Sunday it gets traffic from the Jewish community and a much wider readership. Burton said: “It is a PR disaster for Israel, but we are not a mouthpiece for the Israeli government as we are critical of them, and our editor has said that there are two sides to it.”

Paul Bristow, chief operating officer of Webscreen Technology, said that the attack came as no surprise to him, as they have moved on to become the method of choice for disabling online competitors, and in the past few years geo-political usage of DDoS has become more and more prominent.

He said: “It is clear if you run any online news service that makes comments that someone/anyone is potentially going to take offence to, then it's only a matter of time before you get 'DDoS'd'.”

He recommended getting some dedicated DDoS mitigation technology to make sure upstream bandwidth has enough ‘burstable capacity' to soak up an attack that is at least a 1GB in size, and the greater the ‘burstable capacity' the better.

He said: “Then you monitor and proactively manage your traffic data. This is far more challenging for news services because in theory they are open to traffic from all around the world whereas commercial sites typically only see legitimate traffic from certain geographic zones.”

See original article on scmagazineus.com

Secure Computing Magazine


No Secrets: Julian Assanges Mission for Total Transparency.

The house on Grettisgata Street, in Reykjavik, is a century old, small and white, situated just a few streets from the North Atlantic. The shifting northerly winds can suddenly bring ice and snow to the city, even in springtime, and when they do a certain kind of silence sets in. This was the case on the morning of March 30th, when a tall Australian man named Julian Paul Assange, with gray eyes and a mop of silver-white hair, arrived to rent the place. Assange was dressed in a gray full-body snowsuit, and he had with him a small entourage. We are journalists, he told the owner of the house. Eyjafjallajkull had recently begun erupting, and he said, Were here to write about the volcano. After the owner left, Assange quickly closed the drapes, and he made sure that they stayed closed, day and night. The house, as far as he was concerned, would now serve as a war room; people called it the Bunker. Half a dozen computers were set up in a starkly decorated, white-walled living space. Icelandic activists arrived, and they began to work, more or less at Assanges direction, around the clock. Their focus was Project BAssanges code name for a thirty-eight-minute video taken from the cockpit of an Apache military helicopter in Iraq in 2007. The video depicted American soldiers killing at least eighteen people, including two Reuters journalists; it later became the subject of widespread controversy, but at this early stage it was still a closely guarded military secret.

Assange is an international trafficker, of sorts. He and his colleagues collect documents and imagery that governments and other institutions regard as confidential and publish them on a Web site called WikiLeaks.org. Since it went online, three and a half years ago, the site has published an extensive catalogue of secret material, ranging from the Standard Operating Procedures at Camp Delta, in Guantnamo Bay, and the Climategate e-mails from the University of East Anglia, in England, to the contents of Sarah Palins private Yahoo account. The catalogue is especially remarkable because WikiLeaks is not quite an organization; it is better described as a media insurgency. It has no paid staff, no copiers, no desks, no office. Assange does not even have a home. He travels from country to country, staying with supporters, or friends of friendsas he once put it to me, Im living in airports these days. He is the operations prime mover, and it is fair to say that WikiLeaks exists wherever he does. At the same time, hundreds of volunteers from around the world help maintain the Web sites complicated infrastructure; many participate in small ways, and between three and five people dedicate themselves to it full time. Key members are known only by initialsM, for instanceeven deep within WikiLeaks, where communications are conducted by encrypted online chat services. The secretiveness stems from the belief that a populist intelligence operation with virtually no resources, designed to publicize information that powerful institutions do not want public, will have serious adversaries.

Iceland was a natural place to develop Project B. In the past year, Assange has collaborated with politicians and activists there to draft a free-speech law of unprecedented strength, and a number of these same people had agreed to help him work on the video in total secrecy. The video was a striking artifactan unmediated representation of the ambiguities and cruelties of modern warfareand he hoped that its release would touch off a worldwide debate about the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was planning to unveil the footage before a group of reporters at the National Press Club, in Washington, on April 5th, the morning after Easter, presumably a slow news day. To accomplish this, he and the other members of the WikiLeaks community would have to analyze the raw video and edit it into a short film, build a stand-alone Web site to display it, launch a media campaign, and prepare documentation for the footageall in less than a weeks time.

Assange also wanted to insure that, once the video was posted online, it would be impossible to remove. He told me that WikiLeaks maintains its content on more than twenty servers around the world and on hundreds of domain names. (Expenses are paid by donations, and a few independent well-wishers also run mirror sites in support.) Assange calls the site an uncensorable system for untraceable mass document leaking and public analysis, and a government or company that wanted to remove content from WikiLeaks would have to practically dismantle the Internet itself. So far, even though the site has received more than a hundred legal threats, almost no one has filed suit. Lawyers working for the British bank Northern Rock threatened court action after the site published an embarrassing memo, but they were practically reduced to begging. A Kenyan politician also vowed to sue after Assange published a confidential report alleging that President Daniel arap Moi and his allies had siphoned billions of dollars out of the country. The sites work in Kenya earned it an award from Amnesty International.

Assange typically tells would-be litigants to go to hell. In 2008, WikiLeaks posted secret Scientology manuals, and lawyers representing the church demanded that they be removed. Assanges response was to publish more of the Scientologists internal material, and to announce, WikiLeaks will not comply with legally abusive requests from Scientology any more than WikiLeaks has complied with similar demands from Swiss banks, Russian offshore stem-cell centers, former African kleptocrats, or the Pentagon.

In his writing online, especially on Twitter, Assange is quick to lash out at perceived enemies. By contrast, on television, where he has been appearing more frequently, he acts with uncanny sang-froid. Under the studio lights, he can seemwith his spectral white hair, pallid skin, cool eyes, and expansive foreheadlike a rail-thin being who has rocketed to Earth to deliver humanity some hidden truth. This impression is magnified by his rigid demeanor and his baritone voice, which he deploys slowly, at low volume.

Read the rest of the story at The New Yorker

Photo: Julian Assange
Lily Mihalik/Wired.com

See also:

  • WikiLeaks Was Launched With Documents Intercepted From Tor
  • Rogue Nodes Turn Tor Anonymizer Into Eavesdropper’s Paradise
  • U.S. Soldier on 2007 Apache Attack: What I Saw
  • Electronic Spy Network Focused on Dalai Lama and Embassy Computers

Microsoft hits back over Windows security claims

Software firm reacts angrily to accusations.

Microsoft has returned fire at Google after a report yesterday claimed that the search giant is looking to move away from Windows operating systems because of security concerns.

Brandon LeBlanc, a Windows communications manager at Microsoft, said in a blog post that the accusations about poor Windows security are ironic at best.

He cobbled together a number of reports that suggest the contrary, including one from Mashable which claimed that Yale University has scaled back on moves to use Gmail, and another claiming that Macs are under attack from high risk malware.

LeBlanc said that the article in The Financial Times yesterday, which declared that Windows is "known for being more vulnerable to attacks by hackers and more susceptible to computer viruses than other operating systems", was wrong, insisting that "the facts don't support the assertion".

Google may be considering a move away from Microsoft, but other companies are more confident in its systems, according to LeBlanc.

"When it comes to security, even hackers admit we're doing a better job making our products more secure than anyone else," he wrote.

"And it's not just the hackers; third-party influentials and industry leaders like Cisco tell us regularly that our focus and investment continues to surpass others'.

Copyright v3.co.uk


Symantec warns of hike in World Cup spam

Junk email based on the tournament rises by 27 percent.

Symantec has joined the chorus of voices warning users to brace for a surge in spam centred around the upcoming World Cup in South Africa.

Unsolicited email using the tournament as a lure has risen by around 27 percent in the past month, according to new statistics posted on the security firm's Net Threats 2010 site.

Internet users were warned to expect a range of spam, including offers of counterfeit tickets, malware embedded in fake highlights videos and bogus FIFA product offers.

"We first observed FIFA-related scams way back in 2005 when South Africa was announced as the 2010 host country. However, the message volume during the last couple of months has shot up," wrote Symantec security response lead Samir Patil.

"Not surprisingly, 419 scam messages stand out as major contributors and, with kick-off around the corner, we expect all spam volumes related to the World Cup to grow."

Trend Micro observed similar trends last month, warning users of 419-style spam runs using the tournament as bait.

Copyright v3.co.uk


RateMyCop User Ensnared in Dumbest Case Ever

A Florida man arrested and briefly jailed for posting a local police officer’s home address on a cop-rating site said Wednesday his ordeal was “completely crazy.”

“Just because I posted it, I got arrested. It wasn’t like it was the Pentagon Papers,” Robert Brayshaw, a 35-year-old Tallahassee man, said in a telephone interview.

Brayshaw’s comments came hours after the deadline passed for Florida to appeal a federal judge’s decision declaring the First Amendment trumped Florida’s law meant to protect the privacy of police officers. Brayshaw, who is now unemployed, said it has been difficult to get a job because of his 2008 arrest. He spent nearly three hours in jail and was prosecuted under a 1972 statute making it unlawful to publish personally identifying information of a police officer.

Florida and Tallahassee authorities agreed to pay $60,000 in damages and legal fees to Brayshaw and his lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union.

Brayshaw said the officer “basically had her information listed publicly in the phone book.” He had a beef with the officer regarding a trespassing flap in which he was not charged.

He posted to RateMyCop.com, a 2-year-old website that lets users rate and comment on the uniformed police officers in their community.

RateMyCop uses public-records requests to gather the names and, in some cases, badge numbers of thousands of uniformed cops at police departments around the country, and allows users to post comments about police they’ve interacted with. The site’s launch in 2008 drew cries of outrage from police, who complained that they’d be put at risk if their names were on the internet.

Brayshaw used the site to post anonymous comments about Tallahassee Police Officer Annette Garrett, as well as her name and home address — information not normally cataloged by the site. He wrote that Garrett was rude to him when investigating a trespass call at an apartment complex he was managing.

His case, he said, bounced through three judges, three prosecutors and four public defenders, amid a year of local court proceedings.

“This is the dumbest case in America,” he said.

The authorities subpoenaed RateMyCop and Brayshaw’s internet service provider to learn his identity, then booked him under the Florida law — a misdemeanor carrying up to a year in jail. The case was later dismissed against Brayshaw for procedural reasons, but he sued, claiming the statute chills his speech.

U.S. District Judge Richard Smoak in Tallahassee ruled the First Amendment does not protect “true threats, fighting words, incitements to imminent lawless action, and classes of lewd and obscene speech.” But publishing an officer’s phone number and address, he said, “is not in itself a threat or serious expression of an intent to commit an unlawful act of violence.”

The judge wrote he appreciated the intent of the 38-year-old law, but noted that it went too far. “While the state interest of protecting police officers from harm or death may be compelling,” the judge said the law “was not narrowly tailored to serve this interest.” (.pdf)

Arizona, Colorado and Washington state with similar laws on the books.

See Also:

  • Court: Cyberbullying Threats Are Not Protected Speech
  • Judge Rules Post on Cop-Rating Site is Protected Speech
  • Prison Awaiting Hostile Bloggers
  • Court Strikes Down Internet Censorship Law
  • ‘Skanks’ Blogger Unmasked by Google Vows to Sue Company
  • Yahoo Spouts First Amendment Doublespeak

Wikileaks denies Tor hacker eavesdropping gave site its start

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

WikiLeaks has issued a weak denial that eavesdropping on Chinese hackers played a key part in the early days of the whistle-blowing site.

Wired reports that early WikiLeaks documents were siphoned off from Chinese hackers' activities via a node on the Tor anonymiser network, as an extensive interview with WikiLeaks' founder Julian Paul Assange by the New Yorker explains in greater depth.

One of the WikiLeaks activists owned a server that was being used as a node for the Tor network. Millions of secret transmissions passed through it. The activist noticed that hackers from China were using the network to gather foreign governments information, and began to record this traffic. Only a small fraction has ever been posted on WikiLeaks, but the initial tranche served as the sites foundation, and Assange was able to say, We have received over one million documents from thirteen countries.

Only a very small number of the documents obtained were ever published. However, the first publication on WikiLeaks back in December 2006 was culled from just this Tor-harvested traffic, Wired reports. This tranche of documents referred to a secret decision, supposedly made by Somali rebel leader Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys, to hire criminals as hit men in the assassination of government officials.

The documents were published in an attempt to verify their authenticity, alongside a commentary by Assange noting they might just as easily be a clever smear as the edicts of an Islamic militant with possible links to Al-Queda.

All this smoke and dagger intrigue received short shrift from WikiLeaks in an anonymous and sketchy denial, posted on the site's official Twitter feed late on Tuesday.

Wired has a beatup on WL&Tor,with no new info,spinning "our" 2006 investigation into Chinese spying. Don't be fooled

The Register has asked WikiLeaks to explain what role, if any, Tor traffic snooping might have played in the foundation of the site. We await the site's reply with interest.

Traffic passing through the Tor (The Onion Router) anonymizing network is encrypted until it reaches the point when it leaves the network, where it is decrypted and forwarded to its final destination. Traffic leaving at a particular exit node can always be monitored, a point which Tor has always emphasised. This monitoring may be a criminal offence, depending on where it takes place, and is certainly ethically questionable.

Anyone using Tor should use SSH, SSL, or a VPN connection to encrypt traffic because Tor is only good for anonymity - certainly not end-to-end encryption. Users have no control over which exit nodes will be used, still less on the path traffic takes through the network, which is random by design.

The potential to extract sensitive data by eavesdropping on traffic flowing out of a Tor exit node is well known in security circles.

For example, in September 2007, Swedish security consultant Dan Egerstad ran a packet sniffer on five Tor exit nodes under his control, recovering the login credentials of about 1,000 email addresses, including at least 100 accounts belonging to foreign embassies in the process. One likely theory is that Egerstad had stumbled onto the surveillance of hacked accounts by unknown intelligence agencies, who were using Tor to disguise their identity. Egerstad was hauled in for questioning by the Swedish authorities over this exercise but never charged.

Egerstad was part of a team that also found TOR exit-nodes that only forwarded traffic association with ports used for unencrypted email protocols and IM traffic.

Minor bugs bite patch security checking tool

A security researcher claims to have found a trio of coding bugs in Secunia's popular security inspection tool.

Secunia PSI, which provides a handy way to check if applications installed on a computer are up to date, has a bug in its interface which allows anything to be inserted, according to blogger Raul Romero.

Romero posted a screenshot of a (SFW) rear view of an amply proportioned lady in a tracksuit within the PSI interface to illustrate this point. Another bug allows cookies to be read while the third remains undisclosed at the time of writing.

Thomas Kristensen, chief security officer at Secunia, told The Register that Romero had failed to demonstrate any vulnerability with its technology.

"Based on the vague information he has posted there is no proof of a security issue," Kristensen said.

"However, assuming that one can insert images and scripts as part of the profile, then it would only be a bug and not a security issue because the user only can do this to himself."

He added that Secunia takes any claims about security issues in its technology seriously.

All three bugs - all of which appear to be small beer - are yet to be confirmed but do illustrate the point that even security applications are prone to coding errors from time to time.

No-good scareware varmints exploit Wild West game

Varmints are exploiting interest in a treasure hunt tied to popular Wild West-themed game Red Dead Redemption to lay scareware traps.

One aspect of the game is a treasure hunt, which features cryptic clues and drawings linked to landmarks in the gameworld where hidden virtual bars of gold might be found. Surfers looking to search for these treasure maps online would be advised to proceed with caution.

Miscreants have manipulated search engine results so that many sites that feature prominently in searches for likely terms link to scareware portals. Surfers who visit these sites via Google will be falsely warned that their PCs are crawling with malware in a bid to scare them into buying fake anti-virus software of no utility, as explained in a blog post by Chris Boyd (AKA Paperghost) of Sunbelt Software.

Scareware attacks are increasingly commonplace but are most often themed around breaking news events (eg celebrity deaths, natural disasters etc). Tapping into the buzz created by a popular video game therefore represents something of a shift in tactics by cybercrooks.

"We havent seen other aspects of the game targeted by this Blackhat SEO campaign yet, but that doesnt mean it wont happen," Boyd writes. "Be on your guard and keep your six shooters ready."

The scam targets PC and console gamers because it relies on internet searches for tips and cheats. A full write-up of the attack, including screenshots of the rogue app and poisoned search results, can be found in a blog post by Boyd here.

Debliteck DBCMS "article.php" SQL Injection

Debliteck DBCMS is a PHP-based content manager. The application is exposed to an SQL injection issue because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied input to the "id" parameter of the "article.php" script before using it in an SQL query. DBCMS version 2.01 is affected.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40250

10.22.68 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

NITRO Web Gallery "PictureId" Parameter SQL Injection

NITRO Web Gallery is a PHP-based image gallery. The application is exposed to an SQL injection issue because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied data to the "PictureId" parameter before using it in an SQL query.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40350/references

10.22.78 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

Renista CMS "Default.aspx" SQL Injection

Renista CMS is a web-based content management system. The application is exposed to an SQL injection issue because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied input to the "id" parameter of the "rtl/Default.aspx" script.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40299

10.22.73 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

CU Village CMS Site "index.php" SQL Injection

CU Village CMS Site is a PHP-based content manager. The application is exposed to an SQL injection issue because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied data to the "print_view" parameter of the "index.php" script before using it in an SQL query. CMS Site version 1.0 is affected.

Ref: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40360/references

10.22.83 - CVE: Not Available
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

Finnish police raids target virtual thieves

Finnish police have raided five homes in a search for virtual furniture stolen from Habbo Hotel.

The virtual world, which is big in Finland, claims 15 million users and turns over about $60m a year by charging users for various virtual goods.

Finnish police told the Beeb that they were investigating 400 separate cases of missing pixels with some people reporting the loss of up to 1,000 of stuff.

Such virtual thefts have been relatively common in Asia where gaming and virtual worlds are massively popular. Nor has Europe been immune - a Dutch teenager was arrested for stealing from Habbo Hotel in 2007.

Police believe the latest round of thefts was carried out following phishing attacks to gain users' passwords.

Software SNAFU took out 10,000 military geo locators

As many as 10,000 global positioning system receivers were rendered useless for days as a result of a software upgrade in January that didn't go well, the Associated Press reports.

The "compatibility issue" affected 8,000 to 10,000 of the military's 800,000 GPS receivers, although officials didn't say how many weapons, planes, or other systems were affected or if any of them were in use in Iraq or Afghanistan. An Air Force document said a jet-powered carrier-based drone still under development was interrupted by the glitch.

The disruption was touched off on January 11, when new software was installed in ground control systems for GPS satellites. The affected receivers were manufactured by California-based Trimble Navigation Limited. Trimble said it detected no problems when it tested the new software prior to installation. The upgrade was designed to accommodate a new generation of GPS satellites called Block IIF.

GPS has allowed the military to operate with fewer warheads and personnel. Forces that are dependent on the technology to take out targets become vulnerable when it is disrupted. A military spokesman said officials are "extremely confident in the safety and security of the GPS system from enemy attack."

More from the AP is here.

Facebook hit by new clickjacking attack

Uses 'like' function.

Multiple reports were made over the weekend of a new Facebook exploit that made it appear a user ‘liked' a page that they did not actually 'like'.

Softpedia warned of a clickjacking worm that forced hundreds of thousands of unsuspecting Facebook users to unknowingly post spam messages on their profiles, using news headlines to lure its victims into the trap.

It warned that clicking on the messages takes users to external pages hosted at blogspot.com, which only display a text that reads ‘click here to continue'. However, clicking anywhere on the page abuses a user's active Facebook session to publish a spam message back to their profile.

Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos, said that the trick lures visiting users into ‘liking' a page without necessarily realising they are recommending it to all of their Facebook friends.

He said: “Unfortunately, as we're all too aware, messages such as ‘lol this girl gets owned after a police officer reads her status message' are exactly the kind of content that people will click on on Facebook.

“If you believe you may have been hit by this attack, view the recent activity on your news feed and delete entries related to the above links. Furthermore, you should view your profile, click on your Info tab and remove any of the pages from your ‘likes and interests' section.”

Sophos detected the offending web pages as being infected by Troj/Iframe-ET.

Meanwhile, Roger Thompson, chief research officer at AVG, warned that rogue adware installer apps were active and catching victims by taking them to a page where it asks to download software to view a video.

He said: “Bottom line is still that if you ever have to install something to watch a video, don't. Just don't, ok? Oh, and if ever you're asked to login to Facebook (or anywhere else for that matter), please pay attention to the address bar in the browser, and make sure you're at the right place.”

See original article on scmagazineuk.com

Secure Computing Magazine


Google to discontinue Windows use for workers: report

Response to China attacks.

Google is planning to migrate its employees away from the use of Windows in the wake of Chinese-led targeted attacks that raided its corporate infrastructure of intellectual property, a  report in the Financial Times has claimed.

Since the attacks, which were disclosed in January and which took advantage of a zero-day vulnerability in Internet Explorer (IE), many Google employees have opted for the Mac OS X, while new employees are given the option of using a Mac or Linux platform, according to the report. If a worker wants a Windows machine, they must seek approval from the CIO.

The reason for the switch appears to be related to security, but some said it also has been prompted by the forthcoming release of Chrome OS, which will compete with IE, the report said.

Google would not specifically address the article, the search giant said in a brief statement emailed to SCMagazineUS.com.

"We're always working to improve the efficiency of our business, but we don't comment on specific operational matters," a Google spokesman said.

The company has more than 20,000 full-time employees.

A Microsoft spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

See original article on scmagazineus.com

Secure Computing Magazine


DHS Alarmed by Sticker of Suicide Bomber; Really a Graffiti Artists Logo

A sticker, like the one above, was found on an airport trashcan, raising concern among security officials. (Photo courtesy Rene Gagnon)

A sticker found on a trash can at a Washington, D.C., airport last week depicting what appeared to be a suicide bomber is actually the logo of a popular graffiti artist. His fans have plastered his stickers around the world since around 2005.

The sticker caused a bit of stir among Department of Homeland Security officials, who on Thursday began circulating a photo to other law enforcement agencies, government officials and corporate security companies seeking anyone who might have more information about the iconography.

“Attached is a photo taken of a sticker placed on a trash bin at Reagan National Airport,” read the e-mail from DHS’ Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. “ICE is circulating this photo to see if anyone knows anything about it. If you know of anyone who may be able to identify it, please forward.”

The sticker depicts a man clad in black trench coat, pants and baseball cap with his arms outstretched and his face pointed toward the sky. Strapped to his chest are several canisters in what looks like a bomb.

But appearances are deceiving.

“Those are spray-paint cans on my chest, not bombs,” says artist Rene Gagnon, who has used the self-portrait in his art work, and as a logo on his website, stickers and business cards, for nearly five years.

Artist Rene Gagnon in the original studio picture used as the basis for his logo and stickers. (Photo courtesy Rene Gagnon)

The image was originally part of a street piece Gagnon created, but has been featured in art shows in New York and Norway, as well. Gagnon says it’s a play on several themes, including a common term used in the graffiti world since the 1970s to describe artists.

“‘When you go out and ‘bomb,’ it’s the idea of you going out and putting up your work,” he says.

He thought about incorporating the image into his work during one period when suicide bombers were in the news.

“I had wanted to make an interpretation of me giving all of myself to my work,” he says. “I wanted to convey that the cans were exploding color, and that’s how my art was being created. One thing I do in my art work is explode cans of spray paint on my canvas.”

He has four different versions of the sticker, some of which show color exploding out of the cans. He posts the stickers in streets whenever he travels and distributes them free to anyone who buys prints on his website. As a result, people have posted the stickers on streets in Japan, Norway, the United Kingdom and elsewhere. People send him pictures of stickers they’ve seen in unusual places.

Gagnon says he’s a little concerned that security authorities might get the wrong impression from the sticker they found at the airport.

“If you just take the time to look closely at it, you can see that it’s spray-painting cans,” he says. “I dont want people flipping out now because of this sticker.”

It wouldn’t be the first time someone flipped out over the image.

He recently found out that someone who saw one of the stickers pasted at a Dunkin’ Donuts restaurant in Fall River, Massachusetts, took a picture of it to the police.

“He said, ‘I think the Dunkin’ Donuts is going to bet bombed,’” Gagnon recalls. “The cops were like, ‘Are you out of your mind?’ He didn’t know that was my logo.”

The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a call for comment.


Wikileaks Was Launched With Documents Intercepted From Tor

Wikileaks, the controversial whistleblowing site that exposes secrets of governments and corporations, bootstrapped itself with a cache of documents obtained through an internet eavesdropping operation by one of its activists, according to a new profile of the organization’s founder.

More than a million documents were siphoned by the activist as they traveled across the internet through Tor, also known as “The Onion Router,” a sophisticated privacy tool that lets users navigate and send documents through the internet anonymously.

The siphoned documents, supposedly stolen by Chinese hackers or spies who were using the Tor network to transmit the data, were the basis for Wikileaks founder Julian Assange’s assertion in 2006 that his organization had already “received over one million documents from thirteen countries” before his site was launched, according to the article in the New Yorker.

Only a small portion of those intercepted documents were ever posted on Wikileaks, but the report is the first indication that some of the data and documents on WikiLeaks did not come from sources who intended for the documents to be seen or posted. It also explains an enduring mystery of Wikileaks’ launch: how the organization was able to amass a collection of secret documents before its website was open for business.

Tor is a sophisticated privacy tool endorsed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and other civil liberties groups as a method for whistleblowers and human-rights workers to communicate with journalists, among other uses. In its search for government and corporate secrets traveling through the Tor network, it’s conceivable that WikiLeaks may have also vaccuumed up sensitive information from human-rights workers who did not want their data seen by outsiders.

The interception may have legal implications, depending on what country the activist was based in. In the U.S., the surreptitious interception of electronic communication is generally a violation of federal law, but the statute includes a broad exception for service providers who monitor their own networks for legitimate maintenance or security reasons. “The statutory language is broad enough that it might cover this and provide a defense,” says former U.S. federal prosecutor Mark Rasch.

The New Yorker article did not indicate whether WikiLeaks continues to intercept data from the Tor network. Assange did not immediately return a call for comment from Threat Level.

WikiLeaks uses a modified version of the Tor network for its own operations, moving document submissions through it to keep them private. WikiLeaks computers also reportedly feed “hundreds of thousands of fake submissions through these tunnels, obscuring the real documents,” according to the New Yorker.

The intercepted data was gathered from Tor sometime before or around December 2006, when Assange and fellow activists needed a substantial number of documents in their repository in order to be taken seriously as a viable tool for whistleblowers and others.

The solution came from one of the activists associated with the organization who owned and operated a server that was being used in the Tor anonymizing network. Tor works by using servers donated by volunteers around the world to bounce traffic around en route to its destination. Traffic is encrypted through most of that route, and routed over a random path each time a person uses it.

Under Tor’s architecture, administrators at the entry point can identify the user’s IP address, but can’t read the content of the user’s correspondence or know its final destination. Each node in the network thereafter only knows the node from which it received the traffic, and it peels off a layer of encryption to reveal the next node to which it must forward the connection.

By necessity, however, the last node through which traffic passes has to decrypt the communication before delivering it to its final destination. Someone operating that exit node can therefore read the traffic passing through this server.

According to the New Yorker, “millions of secret transmissions passed through” the node the Wikileaks activist operated — believed to be an exit node. The data included sensitive information of foreign governments. The activist believed the data was being siphoned from computers around the world by hackers who appeared to be in China and who were using the Tor network to transmit the stolen data. The activist began recording the data as it passed through his node, and this became the basis for the trove of data Wikileaks said it had “received.”

The first document WikiLeaks posted at its launch was a secret decision signed by Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys, a Somali rebel leader for the Islamic Courts Union. The document, which called for hiring hit men to execute government officials, had been siphoned from the Tor network.

Assange and the others were uncertain of its authenticity, but they thought that readers, using Wikipedia-like features of the site, would help analyze it. They published the decision with a lengthy commentary, which asked, Is it a bold manifesto by a flamboyant Islamic militant with links to Bin Laden? Or is it a clever smear by US intelligence, designed to discredit the Union, fracture Somali alliances and manipulate China?

The documents authenticity was never determined, and news about Wikileaks quickly superseded the leak itself.

Since then, the site has published numerous sensitive documents related to the U.S. military, foreign governments and corporations. Wikileaks made headlines in April when it published a classified U.S. Army video showing a 2007 attack by Apache helicopters in an Iraqi neighborhood. The raid killed at least 18 people, including two Reuters employees, and injured two children.

Wikileaks, whose website is hosted primarily through a Swedish Internet service provider called PRQ.se, never reveals the sources of its documents, and in the case of the Apache video, Assange has said only that it came from someone who was angry about the military’s frequent use of the term “collateral damage.”

The New Yorker doesn’t identify the WikiLeaks activist who was the source for the documents siphoned from Tor, but the description of how the documents were obtained is similar to how a Swedish computer security consultant named Dan Egerstad intercepted government data from five Tor exit nodes he set up in 2007 — months after Wikileaks launched — in Sweden, Asia the United States and elsewhere.

Egerstad told Threat Level in August 2007 that he was able to read thousands of private e-mail messages sent by foreign embassies and human rights groups around the world by turning portions of the Tor internet anonymity service into his own private listening post. The intercepted data included user names and passwords for e-mail accounts of government workers as well as correspondence belonging to the Indian ambassador to China, various politicians in Hong Kong, workers in the Dalai Lama’s liaison office and several human-rights groups in Hong Kong.

Egerstad, who says he has no association with WikiLeaks and was not the source for the intercepted Tor documents the site received, told Threat Level at the time that he believed hackers were using the Tor network to transmit data stolen from government computers and that he was able to view the data as it passed through his node unencrypted.

Egerstad was never able to determine the identity of the hackers behind the data he intercepted, but it’s believed that he may have stumbled across the so-called Ghost Net network — an electronic spy network that had infiltrated the computers of government offices, NGOs and activist groups in more than 100 countries since at least the spring of 2007.

The Ghost Net network was exposed by other researchers last year who discovered that hackers — believed by some to be based in China — were surreptitiously stealing documents and eavesdropping on electronic correspondence on more than 1,200 computers at embassies, foreign ministries, news media outlets and non-governmental organizations based primarily in South and Southeast Asia.

Photo: Julian Assange (Lily Mihalik/Wired.com)

See also:

  • Embassy E-mail Account Vulnerability Exposes Passprot Data and Official Business Matters
  • Roge Nodes Turn Tor Anonymizer Into Eavesdropper’s Paradise
  • U.S. Soldier on 2007 Apache Attack: What I saw
  • Electronic Spy Network Focused on Dalai Lama and Embassy Computers

Most Recent Post

MORE ON ARCHIVE
Widget by Mad Tomato

Help Me Expose This Article in Bulk!

Bookmark & Share

- OR -

SELECT YOUR PREFERRED ONE:

Bookmark and Share