Senate Confirms Former RIAA Lawyer for Solicitor General

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

The Senate late Monday confirmed former Recording Industry Association of America lawyer Donald Verrilli Jr.to serve as the nations solicitor general.

Verilli, the White House deputy counsel, assumes the powerful position left vacant by Elena Kagan, who was elevated to the Supreme Court last year. The vote was 72-16 after lawmakers brokered a last-minute deal to avoid a threatened filibuster.

The solicitor general is charged with defending the government before the Supreme Court, and files friend-of-the court briefs in cases in which the government believes there is a significant legal issue. The office also determines which cases it will bring to the Supreme Court for review. Verrilli had told senators that he would resign if Obama asked him to take a position “based on partisan political considerations or other illegitimate reasons.”

Verrilli, one of at least five former RIAA attorneys appointed to the administration, is best known for leading the recording industry’s legal charge against music- and movie-sharing site Grokster. That 2003 case ultimately led to Grokster’s demise, when the U.S. Supreme Court sided with a lower courts pro-RIAA verdict. Grokster produced a legal foundation which the RIAA used against file sharing service LimeWire, which shuttered last year and agreed to pay the labels $115 million to settle a lawsuit.

The elevation comes as lawmakers are moving to bolster copyright laws,and as federal authorities employconstitutionally suspect measures toward that end.

Until recently, Verrilli also was leading Viacom’s ongoing and flailing $1 billion copyright-infringement fight against YouTube.

A court dismissed the case last year, a decison Viacom is appealing. Viacom claims YouTube committed copyright infringement because it did not police the video-sharing site for copyright works uploaded by its users.

Meanwhile, Verrilli in 2008 told a federal judge in Minnesota that merely making copyright works available on file sharing networks amounted to copyright infringement — and that no proof of somebody else downloading those files was required.

That argument came in the first of three iterations of the infamous Jamie Thomas file sharing case brought by the RIAA. The judge eventual declared a mistrial of the first jurys $220,000 civil judgment for sharing 24 songs on Kazaa.

Two more trials later, a third jury has rendered a $1.5 million verdict against Thomas for sharing the same two dozen tracks.

Photo: David Kravets/Wired.com


RSA makes token offer to worried customers

RSA has offered to replace its customers' security tokens following confirmation that an important customer had come under attack, in an incident made possible by an earlier high-profile hack against RSA's systems.

SecurID, RSA's two-factor authentication system, uses a token which generates a pseudo-random six-digit passcode every minute or so. The technology is widely used alongside standard user name and passwords as a means to adds extra security to remote access by many organisations and service provider.

The value of a passcode depends on the so-called seed numbers.

RSA admitted it had come under attack in March and said that this might affect its SecureID systems without saying what was taken. Experts have speculated that hackers may have made off with a portion of its seed number database but this remains unconfirmed.

From that point it would only be necessary to match serial numbers of tokens to portions of the stolen database to circumvent the protection offered by SecurID tokens.

At the time of the original breach, RSA attempted to reassure customers by saying that "we are confident that the information extracted does not enable a successful direct attack on any of our RSA SecurID customers".

This assurance has been undermined by the confirmation by defence contractor LockHeed Martin that it had come under attack from an assault based on information gleaned from the earlier RSA SecurID token breach. Lockheed Martin blocked the attack but the concern remains that other organisation might not fare so well.

Unconfirmed reports suggest two other defence contractors - L3 Communications and Northrup Grumman - have been obliged to suspend remote access after they also came under attack from assaults leveraging the original RSA hack.

The suspicion is that these contractors have been targeted for industrial-espionage by the highly-skilled hackers, possibly in the employ of national government or intelligence agencies.

In response to Lockheed's confirmation of a hack attack against its systems, RSA has extended an offer to replace SecurID tokens at no cost to its customers, providing they have "concentrated user bases typically focused on protecting intellectual property and corporate networks".

It's not immediately clear what proportion of RSA's customer base is covered by the replacement offer. Worse still, it's unclear if the new tokens might one day be subject to the same problem as the old tokens clearly face.

There's more to be said on this. One thing for sure is that RSA's original line for withholding technical details of the original attack because this would help the bad guys is now toast.

Men pocket $1.5m in alleged ATM skimming spree

Four men have been charged with stealing $1.5 million from banks by using electronic devices to secretly record personal identification numbers as customers entered them into automatic teller machines and other gear.

Most of the skimming devices used in the 14-month spree involved the use of fraudulent pads that customers use to enter their account PINs before engaging in a transaction with a teller. According to an indictment filed in federal court Monday, the men surreptitiously replaced PIN pads in at least seven banks in Manhattan, Chicago and the Miami area with identical-looking devices that recorded confidential data each time they were used. The compromised PIN pads were equipped with the ability for the stolen data to be accessed remotely.

The men also placed skimming devices on the card readers of automatic teller machines located in bank vestibules, according to the 14-page indictment. The two banks targeted were Citibank and JPMorgan Chase, prosecutors said.

After obtaining the confidential account information, the men then encoded the stolen account information onto the magnetic stripes of blank plastic cards, such as store gift cards and used the counterfeit cards to make unauthorized withdrawals from the accounts that corresponded to the purloined information. In all, the men pocketed at least $1.5 million in the scheme, which lasted from March 2010 to May, prosecutors said.

The indictment names Mihail Draghici, Ionel Dedulescu and Laurentiu Mugurel Manta, who were identified as citizens of Romainia. It also names Didi Theodor Ciulei, whom prosecutors said was a citizen of Austria. Ciulei and Manta were arrested on May 29 in Chicago. Draghici and Dedulescu were arrested in December at Miami International Airport while attempting to board an international flight.

All four are charged with one count each of conspiracy to commit bank fraud, conspiracy to commit access device fraud, and aggravated identity theft. Draghici and Dedulescu are additionally changed with bank fraud. If convicted, Draghici and Dedulescu face a maximum of 69 years in prison; Ciulei and Manta face a maximum of 62 years.

Radvision iVIEW SCOPIA Management Suite Unspecified SQL Injection

iVIEW SCOPIA Management Suite is a network management tool. The application is exposed to an unspecified SQL injection issue because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied data before using it in an SQL query. Versions prior to iVIEW SCOPIA Management Suite 7.5 are vulnerable.

Ref: http://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2011/JVNDB-2011-000030.html

11.23.17 CVE: CVE-2011-1328
Platform: Web Application - SQL Injection

LulzSec Claims Another Sony Hack

LulzSec, which hacked into Sony last week and posted stolen e-mail addresses and passwords of about 50,000 consumers, said it hacked the Japanese media giant again on Monday.

This time, the group announced it had swiped 54 megabytes of “Sony Developer source code.”

A member of the anonymous group, meanwhile, was allegedly taken into custody by the FBI, according to a report that could not be independently verified.

LulzSec is the same group that claimed itcracked PBS last month to protest Frontline’s hour-long documentary on WikiLeaks. In that hack, the group stole and posted thousands of stolen passwords.

The group has also claimed responsibility for hacking Sony’s Japanese website and Fox.com, where the group stole and posted 363 employee passwords and the names, phone numbers and e-mail addresses of 73,000 people who had signed up for audition information for the upcoming Fox talent show The X-Factor.

The latest Sony hack is a seemingly endless series of intrusions at the company. They began with massive breaches in April that compromised account information on 77 million users of Sony’s PlayStation Network, and another 25 million at Sony Online Entertainment, the company’s game development arm.

Nobody has claimed credit for those large attacks, but the hacking group Anonymous had recently declared Sony a target in protest of the company’s lawsuit against PlayStation 3 tinkerer George Hotz. Sony claimed an Anonymous calling card was found on one of the servers compromised at SOE.

See Also:

  • Sony Hit Yet Again; Consumer Passwords Exposed
  • Anonymous Hacks Security Firm Investigating It; Releases E-mail
  • Sony Settles PlayStation Hacking Lawsuit
  • How One Man Tracked Down Anonymous And Paid a Heavy Price
  • Hacker Spies Hit Security Firm RSA

1000 day wait for Sarah Palin emails nearly over

After close to 1,000 days, the Alaska governor's office is finally set to release more than 24,000 pages of emails sent between former Gov. Sara Palin during her first 21 months in office.

The release will take place on Friday in Juneau and will comprise electronic messages sent and received by Palin and her husband Todd using various addresses, including one from a Yahoo Mail account. Citizens have invoked open government laws to obtain the email since Palin was named as the 2008 Republican candidate for vice president. On Friday, it will have been 997 days that reporters from MSNBC.com and other news outlets have been seeking the documents, eclipsing the 966 days that she was Alaska governor.

The charge for the 24,199-page dump is a reasonable $725.97, or 3 cents a page, a far cry from the $15 million price tag state bean counters had previously quoted for the release. It will not include 2,275 pages that will be withheld and an additional 140 pages that were deemed to be non-records. The release will include emails sent from December 2006, when she took office, to September 2008.

Electronic correspondence from her last 10 months in office will be released later.

The state of Alaska refused requests to release the emails electronically, agreeing instead to make them available by hard copy only. MSNBC is working with Mother Jones and Pro Publica to scan the documents so that they can be restored do their electronic form.

So far, the only Palin emails that have been subjected to public scrutiny were the handful of messages that were posted to WikiLeaks following the breach of her Yahoo Mail account. The perpetrator of the break in, has been sentenced to 366 days in federal prison after he was convicted of using publicly available information to reset Palin's account.

Stolen RSA data used to hack defense contractor

Defense contractor Lockheed Martin has confirmed that a recent attack on its network was aided by the theft of confidential data relating to RSA SecurID tokens employees use to access sensitive corporate and government computer systems.

According to an email the company sent to reporters, theft of the data for the RSA tokens was a direct contributing factor in last month's intrusion into its network. The New York Times, which reported on the email earlier, cited government and industry officials, who said the hackers used some of the purloined information and other techniques to piece together the coded password of a Lockheed contractor who had access to Lockheed's system.

Lockheed said it detected the attack soon enough to prevent those responsible from accessing important data. The company is in the process of replacing 45,000 SecurID tokens used by its workers when logging in corporate networks from home or hotels. The contractor, which makes fighter planes, spy satellites and other gear related to national security, is also requiring workers to change their passwords.

In March, RSA said only that an extended and highly sophisticated attack on its network resulted in the theft of data that could compromise the security of SecureID's current two-factor authentication implementation as part of a broader attack on customers that use the tokens. RSA has said some 40 million people use SecurID to access sensitive data on their employers' networks.

To the chagrin of many security experts, RSA has steadfastly refused to say exactly what data was stolen, or at the very least, say whether it included details that could allow government or corporate spies to predict the one-time passwords that SecurID tokens generate every 60 seconds. Critics have speculated that the attackers obtained complete or partial seed keys that are central to the security of the devices.

Lockheed's confirmation that the theft played a direct role is sure to strengthen those assumptions. The leak would be tantamount to a thief finding a huge ring of keys without knowing the specific doors that they unlock. Hackers would still have to know which individual seed is used by a given customer or employee and then obtain a separate password used along with the one-time password generated by the token.

RSA has declined to provide any additional details about the data theft on the grounds that they would further threaten the security of its customers. In light of the information black out, The Reg has suggested customers should assume SecurID is broken, an argument that seems to be resonating with more and more security experts.

For owner/operators that have secure remote access always on, it is time to look at and consider other authentication options besides the currently deployed SecureID tokens, Dale G. Peterson, an expert in the security of computerized industrial control systems wrote in a blog post published on Monday.

According to Wired.com, defense contractor L3 Communications recently warned employees that hackers were targeting the company using the stolen SecurID data. Fox News has reported that Northrup Grumman also suspended remote access to its network, sparking speculation that its security has also been compromised as a result of the leak.

Representatives from RSA and its parent company EMC declined to comment for this article.

Cameron calls for ISP-level parental censorship tools

Prime Minister David Cameron has warned ISPs to be more robust with their plans to provide better tools to help parents censor sexualised content online, or else the government could step in with its own regulation measures.

"The social response is not something we can leave to chance. We need to make sure we hold businesses and regulators to account in a transparent way," said Cameron.

His comments came as the Department for Education published a report today carried out by Mothers' Union CEO Reg Bailey, who issued a raft of recommendations urging British businesses to cut down on the amount of marketing aimed at children through various media outlets including the internet.

Bailey called on ISPs to develop better controls to help parents be more selective about what their children can and can't see online.

Here's the full text (available via the DfE website) on the internet measures Bailey recommended in his report:

To provide a consistent level of protection across all media, as a matter of urgency, the internet industry should ensure that customers must make an active choice over what sort of content they want to allow their children to access.

To facilitate this, the internet industry must act decisively to develop and introduce effective parental controls, with government regulation if voluntary action is not forthcoming within a reasonable timescale. In addition, those providing content which is age-restricted, whether by law or company policy, should seek robust means of age verification as well as making it easy for parents to block underage access.

ACTION: Internet industry and providers of age-restricted content, through the UK Council for Child Internet Safety (UKCCIS)

Last month, telco TalkTalk became the first major UK ISP to implement network-level anti-malware blockers on its service.

The system arrived later than originally planned, after the company quietly begun following its customers around the web and scanning what they looked in the summer of 2010 as part of TalkTalk's development of its anti-malware system dubbed "HomeSafe".

It had expected to launch the system late last year, but in July 2010 Information Commissioner Christopher Graham chided TalkTalk for following its 4.2 million customers around the web without telling them.

TalkTalk later provided the commissioner with documents to support its public claims that the technology and the trials complied with privacy laws, paving the way for the system to be released last month.

Bailey's recommendation points to ISP customers needing to make an "active choice" over what content they want their children to see online. In other words, they get the final say on what is filtered out.

To provide that option, Bailey is calling on the internet industry to offer either a network-level filtering system, such as the one TalkTalk just introduced, or else via "pre-installed software on a new laptop".

"We believe that this will substantially increase the take-up and awareness of these tools and, consequently, reduce the amount of online adult material accessed by children," reads the report.

Current online age verification methods are also pooh-poohed in the review.

"The fact that we do not have a national identity system in the UK is sometimes offered as a reason why age verification cannot be improved," it said.

"However, we note that age verification has to be in place in non-internet environments by law (for example, the sale of pornography on DVD) and if we as a society are saying that the supply of adult material needs control, then that control should operate across all outlets, irrespective of the ease of checking the buyers age."

As we've reported previously, this could soon change given that the Cabinet Office has already issued a pre-tender notice to encourage what it described as submissions from "trusted private sector identity service providers" on developing the concept of so-called "ID Assurance".

Some might argue that such a move could be the Cabinet Office's backdoor way in to creating its very own ID database, an idea which previously foundered along with the National ID Card scheme.

Perhaps learning from the mistakes of the past, the Cabinet Office is keen to consult privacy activists and make noises about saving billions of pounds in the public purse by making services "digital by default". Whether such a scheme will eventually resemble the ID cards system, sans the cards, remains to be seen, however.

Adobe rushes out patch for all-platform Flash vuln

Adobe has fixed a potentially serious cross-platform security bug in its Flash Player software with an out-of-sequence security update.

A series of patches for different platforms, published on Sunday, tackles a cross-site scripting vulnerability in Flash.

Adobe Flash Player version 10.3.181.16 and earlier across a range of platforms (Windows, Macintosh, Linux and Solaris) needed to be patched, as explained in a Adobe security bulletin here.

Adobe describes the security updates as "important" and not critical, which makes it a little surprising that the update happened outside the software developer's quarterly update cycle.

Applications from Adobe are among the most commonly used for attacks on software platforms these days, so it is just as well the vulnerability has been patched before the bad guys got around to turning it into a tool for targeted hacking attacks.

Tech 'tecs quiz Yorkshireman in Facebook hack probe

Monday, June 6, 2011

Police have arrested and questioned a Yorkshire man over allegations that he hacked into social networking website Facebook.

The unnamed 26-year-old from Yorkshire was arrested by police from the National Hi-Tech Crime Unit on Thursday. He was subsequently released on police bail pending further inquiries.

Details of the alleged crime, and how it was uncovered, are sketchy.

"While no user data was compromised, we have been working closely with Scotland Yard and the FBI as we take every attempt to hack our internal systems extremely seriously," a Facebook spokeswoman told The Yorkshire Post. "However, we have no further comment as this is an ongoing criminal investigation."

FBI affiliates hacked by LulzSec

Mischief-making hacking group LulzSec hacked into the systems of an FBI-affiliated public-private partnership organisation, defacing its website and leaking its email database in the process.

Website defacements included mooching messages such as "LET IT FLOW YOU STUPID FBI BATTLESHIPS" and a video clip. Part of the message suggests that LulzSec launched the attack as some sort of response to the Obama administration's plans to make hacking an act of war.

Apart from website meddling there were data losses including the personal info for 180 users at Infragard, a private-public partnership between the FBI and US business that works in cyber-security.

LulzSec tried the passwords exposed by the hack on other locations, allowing it to hack into other systems thanks to some users' re-use of the same passwords.

In particular it claims to have targeted Karim Hijazi, who used his Infragard password for his Gmail account and a corporate account with a white-hat hacking group he runs, called Unveillance. Documents released by LulzSec include purported chatlogs with Hijazi and internal emails.

Unveillance issued a statement claiming that it had been the target of extortion by Lulzsec.

Over the last two weeks, my company, Unveillance, has been the target of a sophisticated group of hackers now identified as "LulzSec". During this two week period, I was personally contacted by several members of this group who made threats against me and my company to try to obtain money as well as to force me into revealing sensitive data about my botnet intelligence that would have put many other businesses, government agencies and individuals at risk of massive Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks.

In spite of these threats, I refused to pay off LulzSec or to supply them with access to this sensitive botnet information. Had we agreed to provide this data to them, LulzSec would have been able to grow the size and scope of their DDoS attack and fraud capabilities.

LulzSec said, in its response, that it was playing a sting against Hijazi and only sought to exposed the alleged incompetence and lack of professional standards within Unveillance by stringing it along.

Greetings morons. We're writing in response to your recent press statement, which, while blatantly trying to hide your incompetence, attempts to paint an ill-conceived picture on The Lulz Boat.

To clarify, we were never going to extort anything from you. We were simply going to pressure you into a position where you could be willing to give us money for our silence, and then expose you publicly.

Ironically, despite the fact that you A) claimed that you wouldn't do something like that, and B) foolishly got outsmarted yet again, we'd like to point out something that you did do: attempt to cooperate with mystery hackers in order to radically, and illegally, boost your company from the ground. Karim, founder of Unveillance, attempted from the start to work with us for his own gain, and he even offered us payment for certain "tasks".

These tasks, hardly subtle at this point, were those of a malicious nature; destroying Karim's competitors through insider info and holes Karim would supply us. Karim also wanted us to help track "enemy" botnets and "enemy" botnet trackers. All in return for our silence and mutual gain.

LulzSec shot to prominence last month with a high-profile hack against PBS followed days later by a break-in that yielded 1 million user records and coupon codes at Sony BMG sites and the Sony Pictures Entertainment site.

Google grabs social networking trawler PostRank

Google has bought PostRank an analytics firm which claims to make sense from the likes of Facebook, Twitter and other social networking sites.

PostRank looks at the top 20 social sites in order to help sites and companies better engage their audience, and check on how the opposition is doing.

Its product already integrates with Google's own Analytics but presumably this integration will improve. Many companies are struggling with social networking marketing, and finding numbers to justify that investment.

PostRank will move to Google's Mountain View headquarters from its current offices in Ontario.

PostRank said it was excited at the move because Google both understands the importance of the data it collects and has the reach to spread it to millions of users.

PostRank launched in 2007. Financial terms were not disclosed.

Japan seeks unheard-of new uses for cell location data

Japanese operator NTT Docomo plans to use its store of location data to work out where to build more houses, and how many people get stuck during an earthquake.

Those are two just of the potential applications for the huge amount of location data stored by mobile network operators, and where Docomo and the University of Tokyo will be starting their Mobile Spatial Statistics project with a view to finding other ways of exploiting the (anonymous) data for fun and profit.

The project site is entirely in Japanese, so we're grateful to Penn Olson for an explanation and comments from Docomo itself.

Mobile operators always know where their customers are, with a variable degree of accuracy dependent on the cell density. Most attention is on tracking individuals, but there's real value in knowing where the unnamed masses spend their time and it is that data which Docomo is hoping to exploit.

In the case of an earthquake, Docomo hopes it will be able to see where transit routes have been damaged and, based on historical tracking, be able to estimate the numbers of people unable to get home. For urban planning the idea is to be able to track how the distribution of people is changing over time, enabling city planners to address needs before they become problems.

The enormous amount of data stored by network operators isn't really utilised by anyone, at least not yet. That's partly the quantity of data is overwhelming (T-Mobile, for example, had 35,000 points of data for one customer), but also because of privacy concerns.

But it is interesting to note that every time there is a march, protest or gathering the mobile network operators know exactly how many people attended even if the police and organisers can never seem to agree.

NTT Docomo won't be sharing its data willy nilly, telling Penn Olson that "We are willing to offer and make use of our operational data, if it's for our society to grow further. But it is not yet something we will open to the public in a specific format."

There's a huge amount of such data, and we're only starting to work out how best to make use of it.

Google acting as a 'political tool', says China

China has issued a clear warning against Google's plans to grow its business in the People's Republic and labelled the company a "political tool" after hacking claims the company made against Beijing last week.

Google claimed on 1 June that it had uncovered a sophisticated spear phishing attack on prominent US individuals which had originated from China. It said it had detected a targeted campaign to collect hundreds of personal Gmail passwords, many of them belonging to key US government officials, Chinese political activists, military personnel and journalists.

According to Mountain View's claims, those accounts may have been compromised using spear phishing techniques in which victims received highly personalised messages that contained links to counterfeit Gmail pages.

Google claimed that the campaign appeared to "originate from Jinan, China", but didn't present any supporting evidence when it revealed its findings in a blog post last week.

Now, official Beijing newspaper the People's Daily has penned a stern comment piece in its overseas edition, slamming Google for taking a damaging political stance against Communist Party-run China.

It said, according to Reuters, that Google was "deliberately pandering to negative Western perceptions of China, and strongly hinting that the hacking attacks were the work of the Chinese government".

The newspaper added that Google's claims aimed at China "were spurious, have ulterior motives, and bear malign intentions.

"Google should not become overly embroiled in international political struggle, playing the role of a tool for political contention," it argued.

"For when the international winds shift direction, it may become sacrificed to politics and will be spurned by the marketplace."

The comment piece echoed earlier remarks made by Beijing's foreign ministry spokesman, Hong Lei, who said last week that that the "claims of so-called Chinese state support for hacking are completely fictitious and have ulterior motives."

Similarly, official Chinese news agency Xinhua published an editorial on 2 June in which it stated that "enhancing global trust between stakeholders in cyberspace" had been damaged by Google's "chimerical complaints".

The Chinese army, meanwhile, has been mulling over ramping up its cyber-warfare plans, even though the country's infamous Great Firewall is one of the most stringent of its kind in the world today.

Notorious rootkit gets self-propagation powers

Saturday, June 4, 2011

One of the most notorious rootkits has just acquired a self-propagating mechanism that could allow it to spread to new victims, a security researcher has warned.

A new version of the TDSS rootkit, which also goes by the names Alureon and TDL4, is able to infect new machines using two separate methods, Kaspersky Lab researcher Sergey Golovanov wrote in a blog post published on Friday.

The first is by infecting removable media drives with a file that gets executed each time a computer connects to the device. The technique has been around for years and has been used by plenty of other computer worms, including the one known as Conficker. Other than using files with titles such as myporno.avi.lnk and pornmovs.lnk, there's nothing particularly unusual about the way TDSS goes about doing this.

The second method is to spread over local area networks by creating a rogue DHCP server and waiting for attached machines to request an IP address. When the malware finds a request, it responds with a valid address on the LAN and an address to a malicious DNS server under the control of the rootkit authors. The DNS server then redirects the targeted machine to malicious webpages.

After these manipulations, whenever the user tries to visit any web page, s/he will be redirected to the malicious server and prompted to update his/her web browser, Golovanov wrote. The user will not be able to visit websites until sh/he agrees to install an 'update.'

Late last year, TDSS acquired the ability to infect 64-bit versions of Microsoft Windows by bypassing the OS's kernel mode code signing policy. Researchers at security firm Prevx have said it's the most advanced rootkit ever seen in the wild. It is used as a backdoor to install and update keyloggers and other types of malware on infected machines, and once installed it's undetectable by most antimalware programs.

Android app brings cookie stealing to unwashed masses

A developer has released an app for Android handsets that brings website credential stealing over smartphones into the script kiddie realm.

FaceNiff, as the Android app is called, can be used to steal unencrypted cookies on most Wi-Fi networks, giving users a point-and-click interface for stealing sensitive authentication tokens sent over Facebook, Twitter, and other popular websites when users don't bother to use encrypted SSL, or secure sockets layer, connections. The app works even on networks protected by WPA and WPA2 encryption schemes by using a technique known as ARP spoofing to redirect local traffic through the attacker's device. An attacker would have to know the security password, however.

To be sure, FaceNiff doesn't do anything that hasn't been done for decades, and based on a YouTube video and comments on an official support forum, the app seems to have its share of quirks. Programs such as SSLSniff, released years ago by Moxie Marlinspike, contain considerably more powerful capabilities even if they lack a smartphone GUI.

But by making it possible for ordinary Android users to hijack other people's Web 2.0 accounts, FaceNiff has the potential to be something like the smartphone equivalent of Firesheep, a Firefox browser extension that brought new urgency to the decades-old threat of using unencrypted web connections. FaceNiff lacks some of the automated features of Firesheep, but that could change with a few updates to the Android app.

Over the past year or so, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Microsoft have upgraded a variety of their services to add always-on SSL, which is the only effective way to prevent the theft of authentication tokens. Those protections on several occasions have been found to be far from perfect, but they're a step in the right direction.

And they've been rolled out increasingly thanks to the growing awareness that comes from DIY man-in-the-middle tools like Firesheep.

Chinese army: We really need to get into cyber warfare

Senior Chinese officers think that the People's Liberation Army (PLA) needs to make more of an effort on cyber warfare.

Reuters reports on an essay written by PLA colonels Ye Zheng and Zhao Baoxian in the Party-run China Youth Daily. The two officers, who are strategists at the PLA's Academy of Military Sciences, argue that China "must make mastering cyber-warfare a military priority".

The essay goes on to say:

Just as nuclear warfare was the strategic war of the industrial era, cyber-warfare has become the strategic war of the information era, and this has become a form of battle that is massively destructive and concerns the life and death of nations.

Zheng and Baoxian go on to mention the internet as a force for social disruption, mentioning the "domino effect" seen in the Arab Spring revolts that have shaken the foundations of the Middle East in recent times. Reuters reports that the People's Republic has been severely worried by these events, with calls for protest by overseas dissident-run websites in February sparking a wave of pre-emptive arrests in China.

Despite the two colonels' statement that China has yet to prioritise cyber attack and defence, some might say that in fact the People's Republic is one of the more aggressive governments in the cyber arena. The Great Firewall is one of the most serious efforts of its type; Google has only just reported a rash of spear-phishing attacks out of China; many other publicly-known cyber attacks are thought to have originated there.

And these are only the known, authenticated cases. Off the record, senior British figures have told the Reg of serious, embarrassing data losses into China which have never been made public and which are denied by the organisations affected. A US senator said in March that data raids had put America "on the losing end of what could be the largest illicit transfer of wealth in world history".

There's no doubt that in many cases the Chinese government and the PLA get blamed for attacks which were unofficial or didn't really originate in China. It's also surely true that much of the hype in the West is generated by those hoping to profit from increased government and corporate cybersecurity budgets.

But even so there is a lot of Chinese fire behind the security smoke and mirrors: the PLA can probably be counted among the major world cyberwarfare powers. Zheng and Baoxian's paper seems likely to be greeted with cynicism.

Feds: WikiLeaks Associates Have No Right To Know About Demands For Their Records

Birgitta Jonsdottir, a member of Icelands parliament. Fririk Tryggvason/Wikimedia Commons

Three associates of WikiLeaks challenging a government demand for records of their Twitter use have no right to information about similar demands that may have been issued to other internet companies, the Justice Department told a federal judge Thursday.

“[T]he subscribers demand for more itemized information about other sealed matters demonstrates their overriding purpose to obtain a roadmap of the governments investigation, and to determine whether other electronic service providers have received and complied with lawful … orders,” U.S. Attorney Neil H. MacBride wrote in a court filing (.pdf).

“But the subscribers have no right to notice regarding any such developments in this confidential criminal investigation any more than they have a right to notice of tax records requests, wiretap orders, or other confidential investigative steps as to which this Courts approval might be obtained,” MacBride continued.

The controversy is part of an ongoing grand jury investigation in Alexandria, Virginia probing WikiLeaks for its high-profile leaks of classified U.S. material. The government secretly demanded the Twitter records on December 14 under 18 USC 2703(d), which allows law enforcement access to non-content internet records, such as transaction information, without demonstrating the “probable cause” needed for a full-blown search warrant. The people targeted in the records demand don’t themselves have to be suspected of criminal wrongdoing.

The court later unsealed the demand so that Twitter could notify the three subscribers, who have have been opposing the demand with the legal assistance of the ACLU and the EFF. The three are Seattle coder and activist Jacob Appelbaum; Birgitta Jonsdottir, a member of Icelands parliament; and Dutch businessman Rop Gonggrijp. Jonsdottir and Gonggrijp helped WikiLeaks prepare the release of a classified U.S. Army video published last year as “Collateral Murder,” and Appelbaum is the group’s U.S. representative.

Thursday’s 20-page filing by the Justice Department was in response to an ACLU motion filed last month, which asks U.S. District Court Judge Liam O’Grady to make public four additional court dockets that the ACLU believes are 2703(d) orders directed to additional internet companies. Without confirming that other records demands have been filed, prosecutor MacBride argued that there is no legal basis to make any information on other orders available, and that doing so could lead to companies being pressured to fight those demands, if they exist. MacBride makes it clear that he thinks that would be a bad thing.

“At least two of the subscribers have publicly called for other electronic service providers to oppose requests for users information,” MacBride wrote in a footnote, citing separate online essays by Jonsdottir, and Gonggrijp.

A hearing on the issue is tentatively set for June 24, though MacBride argues that no hearing is necessary.


Sony Hit Yet Again; Consumer Passwords Exposed

The hacker group that took over the website of PBS NewsHour last weekend has returned to its first love — hacking Sony.

LulzSec announced Thursday it hacked servers at Sony Pictures and Sony BMG. The group posted what appear to be the stolen e-mail addresses and passwords of about 50,000 consumers who’d registered for one of three Sony promotional sweepstakes: last year’s “Seinfeld — We’re Going to Del Boca Vista!” giveaway, a January contest Sony conducted with AutoTrader, and a Sony contest to promote the film Green Hornet.

The announcement said the group pulled off the hack using a simple SQL injection vulnerability — a common website weakness. LulzSec said more than 1 million consumer accounts were accessible in the breach, but it wasn’t able to grab all the data “due to a lack of resources on our part.” It tweeted a plea for donations to fund further attacks.

LulzSec is the same group that cracked PBS on Sunday to protest Frontlines hour-long documentary on WikiLeaks. In that hack, the group stole and posted thousands of stolen passwords, and added a fake news story to a PBS NewsHour blog reporting that deceased rapper Tupac Shakur had been found alive and well in New Zealand .

Before that, LulzSec hacked Sonys Japanese website and Fox.com, where the group stole and posted 363 employee passwords and the names, phone numbers and e-mail addresses of 73,000 people who had signed up for audition information for the upcoming Fox talent show The X-Factor.

The Sony Pictures hack attack is the latest of a seemingly endless series of intrusions at Sony, which began with massive breaches in April that compromised account information on 77 million users of Sony’s PlayStation Network, and another 25 million at Sony Online Entertainment, the company’s game development arm. Nobody has claimed credit for those large attacks, but the griefer collective Anonymous had recently declared Sony a target in protest of the company’s lawsuit against PlayStation 3 tinkerer George Hotz. Sony claimed an Anonymous calling card was found on one of the servers compromised at SOE.

See Also:
  • Hacktivists Scorch PBS in Retaliation for WikiLeaks Documentary
  • Sony Hack Probe Uncovers Anonymous Calling Card
  • Sony Hacked Again; 25 Million Entertainment Users Info at Risk
  • Chat Log: What It Looks Like When Hackers Sell Your Credit Card Online
  • PlayStation Network Hack: Who Did It?
  • Sony Settles PlayStation Hacking Lawsuit

U.N. Report Declares Internet Access a Human Right

A United Nations report said Friday that disconnecting people from the internet is a human rights violation and against international law.

The report railed against France and the United Kingdom, which have passedlaws to remove accused copyright scofflaws from the internet. It also protested blocking internet access to quell political unrest (.pdf).

While blocking and filtering measures deny users access to specific content on the Internet, states have also taken measures to cut off access to the Internet entirely. The Special Rapporteur considers cutting off users from internet access, regardless of the justification provided, including on the grounds of violating intellectual property rights law, to be disproportionate and thus a violation of article 19, paragraph 3, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The report continues:

The Special Rapporteur calls upon all states to ensure that Internet access is maintained at all times, including during times of political unrest. In particular, the Special Rapporteur urges States to repeal or amend existing intellectual copyrightlaws which permit users to be disconnected from Internet access, and to refrain from adopting such laws.

The report, by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, comes the same day an internet-monitoring firmdetectedthat two thirds of Syria’s internet access has abruptly gone dark, in what is likely a government response to unrest in that country.

See Also:

  • Google to Stop Censoring Search Results in China After Hack Attack
  • U.S. Courts Split on Internet Bans
  • FBI Knocks Down 40 Doors in Probe of Pro-WikiLeaks Attackers
  • FCC Net Neutrality is a Regulatory ‘Trojan Horse,’ EFF Says
  • Egypt Returns to the Internet
  • Egypt’s Last-Standing ISP Goes Dark
  • Tweeting Tyrants Out of Tunisia: Global Internet at Its Best
  • Appeals Court Rules No Privacy Interest in IP Addresses

Judge blasts Cisco's 'unmitigated gall' in ex-exec's arrest

A Canadian judge has lambasted Cisco for its "unmitigated gall" and "duplicity" in goading US prosecutors to push for the public arrest of a former executive who was suing the US networking giant.

Justice Ronald McKinnon's comments were made on Tuesday when he ordered a stay in the extradition of the ex-exec, Peter Alfred-Adekeye, who was charged in the US with 97 criminal counts of hacking into Cisco's network following complaints by the company.

Not coincidentally, it seems, Alfred-Adekeye had filed a civil antitrust suit against Cisco in 2008, charging the company with monopolizing the service and maintenance of its networking equipment, and forcing customers to buy contracts for bug-fixes, patches, and updates.

Alfred-Adekeye was arrested in a trendy Vancouver, BC hotel in May 2010 while in the middle of testifying at a hearing on the antitrust suit before US court officials and four Cisco lawyers.

As reported by the Vancouver Sun, Alfred-Adekeye was "perp-walked through the hotel lobby to a waiting police wagon" and whisked off to jail, where he spent 28 days.

In his decision on Tuesday, Justice McKinnon slammed the allegations that led to Alfred-Adekeye's arrest and the subsequent restrictive bail conditions that prevented him from leaving Canada while awaiting extradition proceedings, saying that the actual reason for his arrest was that he "dared to take on a multinational giant."

An extradition hearing was held on April 19, during which Alfred-Adekeye's lawyer, Marilyn Sandford, charged collusion between US prosecutors and Cisco, called the information provided to Canadian authories "completely pathetic", and characterized the US prosecutor's reasoning for the arrest as being "tortured" and "laughable".

Among the prosecutor's stated reasons for arresting Alfred-Adekeye and preventing him from leaving Canada was that the US Department of Homeland Security could prove that he had snuck in and out of the states to perform his alleged 97 hacking events.

One problem: during that two-year period, Alfred-Adekeye was in the US on a legal visa, and never left the country facts that the US now acknowledges to be true.

The US prosecutor also neglected to tell Canadian authorities that Alfred-Adekeye had filed a civil antitrust suit against Cisco. Two months after his arrest, Alfred-Adekeye and Cisco settled that suit, but the criminal hacking charges remain.

Sandford also argued that the US prosecutor inflated the severity of the hacking charges, characterized Alfred-Adekeye as a flight risk, and asked Canadian authorities to to take the unusual step of arresting him because the prosecutor didn't have time to file a formal extradition request arguments that Sandford called "not truthful."

The arrest, according to Sandford, was a "planned and deliberate" ploy by Cisco and the US prosecutor. "They're in it together," she told McKinnon, " they were both acting abusively."

On Tuesday, McKinnon agreed. The activities of Cisco and the US prosecutor that led to Alfred-Adekeye's arrest, would make an impartial observer "blanch at the audacity of it all," he said, referring to the information they provided to the Canadian authorities as "full of innuendo, half-truths and falsehoods," according to the Vancouver Sun.

"This speaks volumes for Cisco's duplicity," McKinnon said, charging Cisco with "unmitigated gall" in using such a heavy-handed move as an unsupportable arrest and jailing to pressure Alfred-Adekeye to drop or settle his civil antitrust complaint.

McKinnon also came down hard on the fact that Alfred-Adekeye was arrested while giving testimony. "It is simply not done in a civilized jurisdiction that is bound by the rule of law," he said.

McKinnon also agreed with Sandford that the entire episode had a literary quality. He referred to it as as something that could have been written by Joseph Heller, the author of Catch-22. She called it "Kafkaesque."

Webmail buggers attack Yahoo!, Hotmail users

The high-profile phishing campaign targeting the private Gmail accounts of government officials and political activists is part of a wider pattern of attacks also targeting Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail, according to net security firm Trend Micro.

Trend said that whether or not the attacks were related, they were all aimed towards bugging webmail accounts. Some of the current wave of assaults against webmail accounts also use techniques designed to find out what sort of security software victims are running as a prelude to deeper running assaults.

The initial phase of many of these attacks (include the Gmail assault) is a targeted email redirecting users to a fake site designed to con users into handing over their login credentials. Once accounts have been compromised, the attacker surreptitiously changes webmail settings in order to send emails to a drop account under their control.

In addition to monitoring compromised email accounts, the crackers behind the wheeze also use a script that exploits the res:// protocol to discover the type of anti-virus software a victim is using. This data is used to mount further attacks designed to obtain complete control over a victim's PC and not just their webmail account.

Trend Micro recently discovered a strain of malware that uses the res:// protocol to find out what security software a victim is running. The information is used to craft product specific attacks that "have a high probability of success", Trend warns.

Google previously warned that that attackers are exploiting a vulnerability in the MHTML protocol, specifically in attacks targeting political activists. Independent security researcher Greg Walton reports that a MHTML exploit directed against Gmail users initially spread, at least partly, via a phishing message passing through Facebook. Like the recent Gmail phishing attacks, the fraudsters modified account settings to monitor compromised Gmail accounts.

Google is far from alone in all this. Trend Micro researchers in Taiwan have discovered a phishing attack that "exploited a vulnerability in Microsoft's Hotmail service". The malicious email, which posed as a message from the Facebook security team, was capable of compromising a user's account simply by previewing the malicious message.

Yahoo! Mail users have also been targeted, via an attack designed to steal users' authentication cookies. "While this attempt appeared to fail, it does signify that attackers are attempting to attack Yahoo! Mail users as well," Trend Micro reports.

Email addresses associated with the Yahoo! Mail attack were also used to run a different attack, featuring malicious Microsoft Excel spreadsheets, back in March.

A full write-up of recent trends in webmail account hacking can be found in a blog post by Trend Micro here.

Hackers say Acer breach leaked data for 40,000 users

Hackers say they breached the website security of computer-maker Acer and made off with data for 40,000 of its customers.

Screenshots posted on Friday on The Hacker News appeared to show the purchase histories, names, email addresses, and partial addresses and phone numbers for a limited number of customers stored on acer-euro.com. The site said members of the Pakistan Cyber Army were behind the attack and planned to release the data in the next 24 hours.

We got mail from PCA that theysuccessfullyhacked the FTP of ACER and Stole around40,000 Users Data, Various Source Codes stored on server, The Hacker News said.

The report comes as dozens of companies and government agencies, including RSA, the Fox network, and the State of Massachusetts, have suffered security breaches that have leaked sensitive consumer information or proprietary company data. At the top of the list is Sony, which over the past six weeks has been the target of a series of devastating hacks that have exposed details for than 100 million customers, including one that surfaced on Thursday.

In some of the cases, the breaches were the result of targeted phishing campaigns, while in others hackers gained entry by exploiting easy-to-spot vulnerabilities in the companies' website applications.

A screenshot posted on The Hacker News showed an FTP application that appeared to have a valid username and password for ftp.acer-euro.com, but it wasn't clear how the credentials had been obtained.

The report said the hackers also stole source code used on Acer's website.

Acer representatives didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment for this post.

Survey scammers target Doctor Who fans

Surfers following up supposed online excerpts from the eagerly-awaited mid-season finale of Doctor Who will only find themselves stuck in the middle of survey scams, security researchers warn.

Searching from the upcoming episode A good man goes to war on YouTube leads to numerous results but all lead to third party websites, under the pretext that the clip is too long to be loaded onto YouTube.

Surfers going to these sites are told they need to complete a survey in order to unlock the supposed (non-existent) content. At best it's a waste of time; at worst the surveys might trick marks into handing over personal information or signing up for expensive subscription-based mobile services of dubious utility, such as daily horoscopes and the like.

Altogether it's best to wait for the real episode, due to air on the BBC on Saturday.

Chris Boyd, a security researcher at GFI Software, notes that the latest ruse is far from the first time scammers have targeted Who fans.

"The same thing happened when the last series finale was due to air," Boyd writes. "There was also a bit of an issue with various Doctor Who games doing the rounds, too. As always: avoid."

Although links to malware-tainted sites are yet to appear in the latest batch of scams, this remains a possibility.

"Everything we've seen so far is the usual fake video / survey nonsense, but there could well be malware in the offing between now and Saturday," said Boyd.

UN Report Declares Internet Access a Human Right

A United Nations report said Friday that disconnecting people from the internet is a human rights violation and against international law.

The report railed against France and the United Kingdom, which have passedlaws to remove accused copyright scofflaws from the internet. It also protested blocking internet access to quell political unrest.

While blocking and filtering measures deny users access to specific content on the Internet, states have also taken measures to cut off access to the Internet entirely. The Special Rapporteur considers cutting off users from internet access, regardless of the justification provided, including on the grounds of violating intellectual property rights law, to be disproportionate and thus a violation of article 19, paragraph 3, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The report (.pdf) continues:

The Special Rapporteur calls upon all states to ensure that Internet access is maintained at all times, including during times of political unrest. In particular, the Special Rapporteur urges States to repeal or amend existing intellectual copyrightlaws which permit users to be disconnected from Internet access, and to refrain from adopting such laws.

The report, by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, comes the same day an internet monioring firmdetectedthat two thirds of Syria’s internet access hasabruptlygone dark, in what is likely a government response to unrest in that country.

See Also:

  • Google to Stop Censoring Search Results in China After Hack Attack
  • U.S. Courts Split on Internet Bans
  • FBI Knocks Down 40 Doors in Probe of Pro-WikiLeaks Attackers
  • FCC Net Neutrality is a Regulatory ‘Trojan Horse,’ EFF Says
  • Egypt Returns to the Internet
  • Egypt’s Last-Standing ISP Goes Dark
  • Tweeting Tyrants Out of Tunisia: Global Internet at Its Best
  • Appeals Court Rules No Privacy Interest in IP Addresses

Hackers say Acer breach leaked data for 40,000 users

Hackers say they breached the website security of computer-maker Acer and made off with data for 40,000 of its customers.

Screenshots posted on Friday on The Hacker News appeared to show the purchase histories, names, email addresses, and partial addresses and phone numbers for a limited number of customers stored on acer-euro.com. The site said members of the Pakistan Cyber Army were behind the attack and planned to release the data in the next 24 hours.

We got mail from PCA that theysuccessfullyhacked the FTP of ACER and Stole around40,000 Users Data, Various Source Codes stored on server, The Hacker News said.

The report comes as dozens of companies and government agencies, including RSA, the Fox network, and the State of Massachusetts, have suffered security breaches that have leaked sensitive consumer information or proprietary company data. At the top of the list is Sony, which over the past six weeks has been the target of a series of devastating hacks that have exposed details for than 100 million customers, including one that surfaced on Thursday.

In some of the cases, the breaches were the result of targeted phishing campaigns, while in others hackers gained entry by exploiting easy-to-spot vulnerabilities in the companies' website applications.

A screenshot posted on The Hacker News showed an FTP application that appeared to have a valid username and password for ftp.acer-euro.com, but it wasn't clear how the credentials had been obtained.

The report said the hackers also stole source code used on Acer's website.

Acer representatives didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment for this post.

Webmail buggers attack Yahoo!, Hotmail users

The high-profile phishing campaign targeting the private Gmail accounts of government officials and political activists is part of a wider pattern of attacks also targeting Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail, according to net security firm Trend Micro.

Trend said that whether or not the attacks were related, they were all aimed towards bugging webmail accounts. Some of the current wave of assaults against webmail accounts also use techniques designed to find out what sort of security software victims are running as a prelude to deeper running assaults.

The initial phase of many of these attacks (include the Gmail assault) is a targeted email redirecting users to a fake site designed to con users into handing over their login credentials. Once accounts have been compromised, the attacker surreptitiously changes webmail settings in order to send emails to a drop account under their control.

In addition to monitoring compromised email accounts, the crackers behind the wheeze also use a script that exploits the res:// protocol to discover the type of anti-virus software a victim is using. This data is used to mount further attacks designed to obtain complete control over a victim's PC and not just their webmail account.

Trend Micro recently discovered a strain of malware that uses the res:// protocol to find out what security software a victim is running. The information is used to craft product specific attacks that "have a high probability of success", Trend warns.

Google previously warned that that attackers are exploiting a vulnerability in the MHTML protocol, specifically in attacks targeting political activists. Independent security researcher Greg Walton reports that a MHTML exploit directed against Gmail users initially spread, at least partly, via a phishing message passing through Facebook. Like the recent Gmail phishing attacks, the fraudsters modified account settings to monitor compromised Gmail accounts.

Google is far from alone in all this. Trend Micro researchers in Taiwan have discovered a phishing attack that "exploited a vulnerability in Microsoft's Hotmail service". The malicious email, which posed as a message from the Facebook security team, was capable of compromising a user's account simply by previewing the malicious message.

Yahoo! Mail users have also been targeted, via an attack designed to steal users' authentication cookies. "While this attempt appeared to fail, it does signify that attackers are attempting to attack Yahoo! Mail users as well," Trend Micro reports.

Email addresses associated with the Yahoo! Mail attack were also used to run a different attack, featuring malicious Microsoft Excel spreadsheets, back in March.

A full write-up of recent trends in webmail account hacking can be found in a blog post by Trend Micro here.

Chinese army: We really need to get into cyber warfare

Friday, June 3, 2011

Senior Chinese officers think that the People's Liberation Army (PLA) needs to make more of an effort on cyber warfare.

Reuters reports on an essay written by PLA colonels Ye Zheng and Zhao Baoxian in the Party-run China Youth Daily. The two officers, who are strategists at the PLA's Academy of Military Sciences, argue that China "must make mastering cyber-warfare a military priority".

The essay goes on to say:

Just as nuclear warfare was the strategic war of the industrial era, cyber-warfare has become the strategic war of the information era, and this has become a form of battle that is massively destructive and concerns the life and death of nations.

Zheng and Baoxian go on to mention the internet as a force for social disruption, mentioning the "domino effect" seen in the Arab Spring revolts that have shaken the foundations of the Middle East in recent times. Reuters reports that the People's Republic has been severely worried by these events, with calls for protest by overseas dissident-run websites in February sparking a wave of pre-emptive arrests in China.

Despite the two colonels' statement that China has yet to prioritise cyber attack and defence, some might say that in fact the People's Republic is one of the more aggressive governments in the cyber arena. The Great Firewall is one of the most serious efforts of its type; Google has only just reported a rash of spear-phishing attacks out of China; many other publicly-known cyber attacks are thought to have originated there.

And these are only the known, authenticated cases. Off the record, senior British figures have told the Reg of serious, embarrassing data losses into China which have never been made public and which are denied by the organisations affected. A US senator said in March that data raids had put America "on the losing end of what could be the largest illicit transfer of wealth in world history".

There's no doubt that in many cases the Chinese government and the PLA get blamed for attacks which were unofficial or didn't really originate in China. It's also surely true that much of the hype in the West is generated by those hoping to profit from increased government and corporate cybersecurity budgets.

But even so there is a lot of Chinese fire behind the security smoke and mirrors: the PLA can probably be counted among the major world cyberwarfare powers. Zheng and Baoxian's paper seems likely to be greeted with cynicism.

Survey scammers target Doctor Who fans

Surfers following up supposed online excerpts from the eagerly-awaited mid-season finale of Doctor Who will only find themselves stuck in the middle of survey scams, security researchers warn.

Searching from the upcoming episode A good man goes to war on YouTube leads to numerous results but all lead to third party websites, under the pretext that the clip is too long to be loaded onto YouTube.

Surfers going to these sites are told they need to complete a survey in order to unlock the supposed (non-existent) content. At best it's a waste of time; at worst the surveys might trick marks into handing over personal information or signing up for expensive subscription-based mobile services of dubious utility, such as daily horoscopes and the like.

Altogether it's best to wait for the real episode, due to air on the BBC on Saturday.

Chris Boyd, a security researcher at GFI Software, notes that the latest ruse is far from the first time scammers have targeted Who fans.

"The same thing happened when the last series finale was due to air," Boyd writes. "There was also a bit of an issue with various Doctor Who games doing the rounds, too. As always: avoid."

Although links to malware-tainted sites are yet to appear in the latest batch of scams, this remains a possibility.

"Everything we've seen so far is the usual fake video / survey nonsense, but there could well be malware in the offing between now and Saturday," said Boyd.

New Sony hack exposes more consumer passwords

Hackers who last week broke into the website of television network PBS have turned their attention to Sony's movie division, publishing what appeared to be the email addresses and passwords belonging to at least 50,000 consumers who registered for online promotions.

A group called LulzSec claimed responsibility for the attack and said it was achieved by exploiting a simple SQL injection vulnerability on the Sony Pictures website. The group claimed the single attack exposed information for more than 1 million people, but that the group lacked the resources to copy such a massive amount of data.

"What's worse is that every bit of data we took wasn't encrypted," the group wrote in a press release announcing the hack. "Sony stored over 1,000,000 passwords of its customers in plaintext, which means it's just a matter of taking it. This is disgraceful and insecure: they were asking for it."

A Sony spokesman said the company is looking into the claims, but provided no other comment.

LulzSec is the same group that took credit for breaching security at PBS.org last holiday weekend in retaliation for a documentary it claimed was unfair to whistle-blower website WikiLeaks. The pranksters published usernames and hashed passwords for website administrators and users, and they also posted a hoax news story claiming that dead rapper Tupac Shakur was alive and living in the same New Zealand town as nemesis Biggie Smalls.

The group has also hacked Sonys Fox.com and stole hundreds of employee passwords along with the names, phone numbers and e-mail addresses of some 73,000 people who requested audition information for the upcoming talent show The X-Factor.

The compromise of Sony Pictures is the latest embarrassment for Sony, which has suffered a series of devastating hacks since being targeted for its scorched-earth legal campaign against people jailbreaking the PlayStation 3 game console. All told, the attacks have exposed personally identifiable information for more than 100 million Sony customers and cost Sony at least $171 million.

The personally identifiable information contained in Thursday's data dump appeared to belong to people who signed up for promotional campaigns involving AutoTrader.com, Sony's "Summer of Restless Beauty," and a Seinfeld Were Going to Del Boca Vista! giveaway.

Feds: WikiLeaks Associates Have No Right To Know About Demands For Their Records

Birgitta Jonsdottir, a member of Icelands parliament. Fririk Tryggvason/Wikimedia Commons

Three associates of WikiLeaks challenging a government demand for records of their Twitter use have no right to information about similar demands that may have been issued to other internet companies, the Justice Department told a federal judge Thursday.

“[T]he subscribers demand for more itemized information about other sealed matters demonstrates their overriding purpose to obtain a roadmap of the governments investigation, and to determine whether other electronic service providers have received and complied with lawful … orders,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Neil H. MacBride wrote in a court filing (.pdf).

“But the subscribers have no right to notice regarding any such developments in this confidential criminal investigation any more than they have a right to notice of tax records requests, wiretap orders, or other confidential investigative steps as to which this Courts approval might be obtained,” MacBride continued.

The controversy is part of an ongoing grand jury investigation in Alexandria, Virginia probing WikiLeaks for its high-profile leaks of classified U.S. material. The government secretly demanded the Twitter records on December 14 under 18 USC 2703(d), which allows law enforcement access to non-content internet records, such as transaction information, without demonstrating the “probable cause” needed for a full-blown search warrant. The people targeted in the records demand don’t themselves have to be suspected of criminal wrongdoing.

The court later unsealed the demand so that Twitter could notify the three subscribers, who have have been opposing the demand with the legal assistance of the ACLU and the EFF. The three are Seattle coder and activist Jacob Appelbaum; Birgitta Jonsdottir, a member of Icelands parliament; and Dutch businessman Rop Gonggrijp. Jonsdottir and Gonggrijp helped WikiLeaks prepare the release of a classified U.S. Army video published last year as “Collateral Murder,” and Appelbaum is the group’s U.S. representative.

Thursday’s 20-page filing by the Justice Department was in response to an ACLU motion filed last month, which asks U.S. District Court Judge Liam O’Grady to make public four additional court dockets that the ACLU believes are 2703(d) orders directed to additional internet companies. Without confirming that other records demands have been filed, prosecutor MacBride argued that there is no legal basis to make any information on other orders available, and that doing so could lead to companies being pressured to fight those demands, if they exist. MacBride makes it clear that he thinks that would be a bad thing.

“At least two of the subscribers have publicly called for other electronic service providers to oppose requests for users information,” MacBride wrote in a footnote, citing separate online essays by Jonsdottir, and Gonggrijp.

A hearing on the issue is tentatively set for June 24, though MacBride argues that no hearing is necessary.


Admin: Gmail phishers stalked victims for months

Spear phishers who targeted the personal Gmail accounts of senior government officials painstakingly monitored incoming and outgoing email for almost a year, a researcher who helped uncover the campaign said.

In some cases, the attackers sent the victims emails designed to originate from friends or colleagues in hopes of getting responses that detailed the targets' schedules, contacts, and job responsibilities, Mila Parkour, a Washington, DC-based system administrator who does security research on the side, told The Register. The attackers also employed web-based scripts that caused earlier versions of Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser to divulge detailed information about the software used by the compromised account holder.

The ultimate goal, Parkour speculated, was to assemble an arsenal of personal information that could be used in future social-engineering attacks against the targets, who also included undisclosed Chinese political activists, military personnel, and journalists.

"The victims were selected based on their work positions, what they do professionally," Parkour said during an online chat. "Having this information would mean better planned malware laden spear phishing."

On Wednesday, Google said it disrupted the phishing campaign and credited Parkour for help in uncovering the elaborate scheme. But based on Parkour's account, it's safe to say that the disruption came only after personally identifiable information from some victims had been secretly harvested for as long as 9 months.

US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton said the FBI is investigating Google's claims that China was the origin of the secret attacks, The New York Times reported. She described the charges as very serious and said that the Obama administration was disturbed by the claims.

The federal government has no reason to believe that any official US government email accounts were accessed, a spokeswoman for the National Security Council has said.

Parkour said she first learned of the campaign in mid February, when she was asked to examine the PC and Gmail account of one of the victims. By following the trail of messages that had been sent and received, it soon became clear the account had been compromised since at least May 2010, and possibly earlier. She posted some of the fraudulent emails to her personal blog in an attempt to warn others.

Among other things, the attackers took pains to make sure they never lost control of the compromised accounts. Even after they had successfully phished the required password a first time, the attackers sometimes sent phishing emails to the same Gmail account a second or third time, in the event the user had subsequently changed the log-in credentials.

Google said that hundreds of Gmail users were affected and that the attack appeared to originate in Jinan, China. The company didn't offer any evidence to support that latter claim. Parkour said that the IP addresses used by the attackers were based in China and that the script used to harvest information about the victims' PCs -- which had been hosted on the phishing sites -- had long circulated on Chinese hacker forums. But she went on to say those details alone were not enough for her to conclude Chinese hackers were behind the operation.

"In my case I did not have enough data to" determine the attackers' location, she said. "No reputable researcher (would) start pointing fingers at a country without (an) overwhelming number of indicators. I think Google is reputable and I can only assume they had more than one indicator."

A Google spokesman declined to provide any details used conclude the attack appears to have originated in China.

Chinese officials have angrily denounced Google's claims and reminded the world of some of Google's own alleged misdeeds and pointed out the China, too, is sometimes a victim of espionage-motivated hacking.

Parkour praised Google for disrupting campaign, but she also said for many victims, the help may have come too late.

"I think they disrupted that nest and that (phishing) group," she said. "But maybe some new ones were staged so for them the help came on time. For others it was year late but better late than never."

Sony Hit Yet Again; Consumer Passwords Exposed

The hacker group that took over the website of PBS NewsHour last weekend has returned to its first love — hacking Sony.

LulzSec announced Thursday it hacked servers at Sony Pictures and Sony BMG. The group posted what appear to be the stolen e-mail addresses and passwords of about 50,000 consumers who’d registered for one of three Sony promotional sweepstakes: last year’s “Seinfeld — We’re Going to Del Boca Vista!” giveaway, a January contest Sony conducted with AutoTrader, and a Sony contest to promote the film Green Hornet.

The announcement said the group pulled off the hack using a simple SQL injection vulnerability — a common website weakness. LulzSec said more than 1 million consumer accounts were accessible in the breach, but it wasn’t able to grab all the data “due to a lack of resources on our part.” It tweeted a plea for donations to fund further attacks.

LulzSec is the same group that cracked PBS on Sunday to protest Frontlines hour-long documentary on WikiLeaks. In that hack, the group stole and posted thousands of stolen passwords, and added a fake news story to a PBS NewsHour blog reporting that deceased rapper Tupac Shakur had been found alive and well in New Zealand .

Before that, LulzSec hacked Sonys Japanese website and Fox.com, where the group stole and posted 363 employee passwords and the names, phone numbers and e-mail addresses of 73,000 people who had signed up for audition information for the upcoming Fox talent show The X-Factor.

The Sony Pictures hack attack is the latest of a seemingly endless series of intrusions at Sony, which began with massive breaches in April that compromised account information on 77 million users of Sony’s PlayStation Network, and another 25 million at Sony Online Entertainment, the company’s game development arm. Nobody has claimed credit for those large attacks, but the griefer collective Anonymous had recently declared Sony a target in protest of the company’s lawsuit against PlayStation 3 tinkerer George Hotz. Sony claimed an Anonymous calling card was found on one of the servers compromised at SOE.

See Also:
  • Hacktivists Scorch PBS in Retaliation for WikiLeaks Documentary
  • Sony Hack Probe Uncovers Anonymous Calling Card
  • Sony Hacked Again; 25 Million Entertainment Users Info at Risk
  • Chat Log: What It Looks Like When Hackers Sell Your Credit Card Online
  • PlayStation Network Hack: Who Did It?
  • Sony Settles PlayStation Hacking Lawsuit

Friendster password emails spark site hack fears

Multiple users have reported receiving spam emails containing their Friendster password in plain text.

The appearance of the suspicious emails to registered Friendster addresses (widely reported by numerous Twitter users on Thursday) has spawned fears that Friendster database might have been hacked. An alternative theory is that a partner of the once massive social networking site might have leaked the data.

All this remains unconfirmed. We've asked Friendster for a response but are yet to hear back.

We ran an early blog report explaining the suspicious emails past net security firm Sophos: it said that although any individual report might be circumstantial, the collective weight of reports leaves Friendster with some explaining to do.

In the meantime users who received the suspicious emails would be well advised to change their passwords, especially if they used their Friendster password on other sites.

Friendster was one of the original social networking websites but its position was usurped by MySpace and Facebook, at least in the West, where it has since become a topic of parody. The site remained popular in Asia.

Even so the site abandoned social networking altogether last month, repositioning as a social gaming site.

FCC Members: Dont Become AT&T Lobbyists After Approving Merger

A media-reform group is demanding each of the FCC’s four commissioners publicly pledge that they won’t take a lobbying job with AT&T if they approve its proposed merger with T-Mobile.

Departing FCC commissioner Meredith Atwell Bakerresigned her post last month to become the top lobbyist for the merged Comcast-NBC, just four months after she approved that merger. The departure of Baker, who exits Friday, is being examined by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Craig Aaron, president of Free Press, says the revolving-door between the FCC and the industries it regulates creates graveconcerns”about the public’s ability to trust in the integrity of the actions of the Federal Communications Commission.”On Thursday, he wrote chairman Julius Genachowski and commissioners Michael J. Copps, Robert McDowell and Mignon Clyburn and urged themto takea public vow that they won’t go to work for AT&T after reviewing the merger.

“We now live in a climate where the public has to ask their public servants not to work for the companies that they’re supposed to regulate,” he said in a telephone interview.

His letter to the commissioners notes the “unseemliness of the revolving door.”

Commissioner Baker has assured the public that no legal technicalities or ethical rules were violated in her job negotiations with Comcast, and a congressional inquiry is under way to assess her claim. However, even if no rules were broken, what people see is a system where, in a short time, a supposed public servant can approve a multibillion-dollar deal, publicly criticize the FCC’s review for being a time-consuming inconvenience for the company, and then announce that she’s accepted a position with the new giant company. Even in the absence of a clear quid pro quo, this move stinks, and the American people know it.

There is no timeline for the commission to take final action when it decides whether the proposal is in the public’s interest. The comment period is ongoing.

The Justice Department must also sign off on the deal.

Photo: Zrendavir/Flickr

See Also:

  • FCC Chairman Applauds Colleague Departing to Become FCC Lobbyist
  • FCC Net Neutrality is a Regulatory ‘Trojan Horse,’ EFF Says
  • FCC Probing Google Wi-Fi Spy Scandal
  • FCC Lets Hollywood Turn Off Your Output Jacks
  • Court to FCC: You Don’t Have Power to Enforce Net Neutrality
  • FCC Opens File-Sharing Probe (Charade) Into Comcast Traffic

China goes on attack over Google phishing claims

China has angrily denounced Google's claims that it has uncovered a sophisticated spear phishing attack on key US individuals which originated from the heavily firewalled country.

Google said in a blog post that the campaign "affected what seem to be the personal Gmail accounts of hundreds of users including, among others, senior U.S. government officials, Chinese political activists, officials in several Asian countries (predominantly South Korea), military personnel and journalists."

China's response has been swift, if characteristically idiosyncratic.

"Blaming these misdeeds on China is unacceptable," Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei told a news briefing in Beijing, according to The Telegraph.

"Hacking is an international problem and China is also a victim. The claims of so-called Chinese state support for hacking are completely fictitious and have ulterior motives."

Official Chinese news agency Xinhua published an editorial titled 'Google's groundless accuses hurt global trust on Internet'.

The piece stated, "The chimerical complaints by Google have become obstacles for enhancing global trust between stakeholders in cyberspace."

It said it was not appropriate for Google, as a business, to act as an "internet judge".

It added, "Google has not always followed business ethics as it says. The American media reported in mid-May that Google had not been vigilant about policing online pharmaceutical advertisements because they are so lucrative.

"As a result, the Internet search leader distributed online advertisements from illegal pharmacies."

Xinhua also rubbished Google's previous claims that it had traced last year's Aurora attacks to computers at Chinese Shanghai Jiaotong University and Lanxiang Vocational School.

"The report amused many Chinese at that time since Lanxiang Vocational School enjoys a good fame at training chefs for local restaurants," Xinhua said.

Which is of course just what you would say if you were conducting a cyberwar.

Apple strikes back with update blocking new scareware

Apple has updated Mac OS X to detect a piece of scareware that managed to bypass its malware-blocking measures.

As previously reported, a variant of a rogue antivirus package known as MacDefender was introduced on Tuesday that evaded the malware protection feature built into the latest version of the Mac operating system. In a series of events that closely mimics those in the Windows world, the variant was introduced just hours after Apple had added a malware signature designed to stop downloads of the malicious program.

"The cat and mouse game has begun," Mac antivirus provider Intego wrote in a blog post published on Thursday. "We will be following this closely, and testing all new variants as they appear. The people behind this malware have shown that they can react very quickly, and Apple has reacted rapidly as well."

Mac OS X System Preferences > Security > General: better safe than sorry

The latest update is specifically designed to detect a file called mdInstall.pkg, which installs MacDefender.C. Like similarly named programs such as MacGuard, the programs get installed after Mac users are tricked into believing their machines are riddled with infections. The ruse works by presenting people surfing Google Images, Facebook, and other sites with images depicting an antivirus scan on a Mac hard drive. Inevitably, the scan falsely claims that the users' machines are compromised and urges the rogue antivirus package be installed immediately.

Apple added the MacDefender definitions on Tuesday, following widely scattered evidence that the social engineering attacks were achieving their intended result.

The update protecting against the latest variant will automatically be installed on Macs running the latest version of Mac OS X that are configured to do so. To turn on automatic updating, go to System Preferences > Security, and select the General tab. Then make sure there is a check mark next to "Automatically update safe downloads list."

NATO members warned over Anonymous threat

NATO leaders have been warned that the Anonymous "hacktivist" collective might have the capability to threaten member states' security.

A report for the alliance by Lord Jopling, UK general rapporteur and Tory peer, provides a general (mostly factual) overview of the changing nature of the internet.

One key section deals with the use of social media tools to exchange information by people on the ground during the ongoing Arab Spring protests; another deals with the ongoing WikiLeaks affair and its fallout and also covers the hack by Anonymous in solidarity with the whistle-blowing site.

Anonymous is becoming more and more sophisticated and could potentially hack into sensitive government, military, and corporate files.

According to reports in February 2011, Anonymous demonstrated its ability to do just that. After WikiLeaks announced its plan of releasing information about a major bank, the US Chamber of Commerce and Bank of America reportedly hired the data intelligence company HBGary Federal to protect their servers and attack any adversaries of these institutions. In response, Anonymous hacked servers of HBGary Federal's sister company and hijacked the CEO's Twitter account.

Today, the ad hoc international group of hackers and activists is said to have thousands of operatives and has no set rules or membership. It remains to be seen how much time Anonymous has for pursuing such paths. The longer these attacks persist, the more likely countermeasures will be developed, implemented, the groups will be infiltrated and perpetrators persecuted.

Lord Jopling's report is essentially a policy backgrounder and not a call to action. The document leaves it open as to how exactly members of the hacktivist collective might be "persecuted", but the general thrust seems to be that this ought to be an extension of previous law enforcement crackdowns. NATO's role if any in all this seems to be in locking down government and military servers rather than spearheading some military cyber-offensive, much less "taking out" Anonymous-affiliated chat channels.

Only a few years ago, cyberwar barely got a mention in NATO conferences, even in the wake of high-profile cyberattacks on Estonia in April 2007. The ongoing WikiLeaks saga along with the arrival of the industrial-control plant sabotaging Stuxnet worm have changed the game, and this is the real significance of Jopling's report.

Photo Gallery: Weird Government Unabomber Auction Winds Down

<< Previous | Next >>

Call it macabre, or call it settling a debt to society, a two-week online auction of Theodore Kaczynski's writings and other material seized from his Montana cabin in 1996 is winding down.

One of the highest valued lots for sale online by the General Services Administration are his "personal journals." The last bidding was more than $30,000 for his hand written "thoughts and feelings about himself, society and living in the wilderness."

The auction is expected to conclude Thursday or early Friday when all bidding ends.

Kaczynski, dubbed the Unabomber, pleaded guilty in 1998 to a nearly 20-year series of bombings that killed three people and wounded 23. He wanted his property donated to the University of Michigan. The government wanted to keep the material. But the sale was ordered by the courts to raise restitution for his victims.

His so-called "manifesto" in which he railed against technology, was going for more than $17,000. In all, the auction has raised $90,000 so far.

Kaczynski is serving a life sentence without parole for bombings between 1978 and 1995. He led authorities on the nation's longest, costliest manhunt before his brother tipped off authorities in 1996.

Above:

This is the L3 Smith-Corona portable manual typewriter that Kaczynski used to type most of his documents, including the "Manifesto."

<< Previous | Next >> View all

See Also:

  • April 3, 1996: Unabomber Nabbed in His Montana Hideout
  • The Unabomber’s Legacy, Part I
  • Unabomber Reverb: Double Jeopardy, Greek Blast
  • The Unabomber’s Legacy, Part II
  • Unabom Defendant: Mad, or Just Bad?
  • Kaczynski’s High-Tech Hell

Is Apple Ready to Play Cat and Mouse With Malware Developers?

The Security Update 2011-003 that Apple released on Tuesday directly addressed the Mac Defender malware threat in two ways: It changed the way malware files are detected by enabling automatic daily updates, and it included code to remove at least two of its variants. Despite this, malware developers had a version available that skirts past Apple’s protections within about eight hours. Apple’s patch suggests it plans on being more active in addressing possible malware threats, but is Apple ready to take on the role formerly limited to vendors like Norton, Intego and Sophos?

We’ll try to answer that question by first detailing what specific malware protections exist in Mac OS X, and what changes Apple implemented in the latest security update. Then we’ll consider how Apple may plan to take over malware protection for its platform.

File Quarantine

Apple first introduced the File Quarantine system in Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard. That system would tag files that were downloaded from the internet and not known to be safe with a small bit of “quarantine” metadata, including a flag that it might not be a “safe” file, where it was downloaded from and the time it was downloaded.

When a user attempted to open a file with quarantine metadata, the system would warn the user to make sure the file was safe before opening.

Apple enhanced the File Quarantine system in Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard. The system now includes a malware-definitions file that contains information to identify known malware threats, including OSX.RSPlug.A and OSX.OpinionSpy.

When a quarantined file is first double-clicked, the file is scanned against the definitions to see if it matches any known malware. If it does, Mac OS X will warn the user that the file “will damage your computer,” noting the specific malware detected and offering to move it to the Trash.

Security Update 2011-003 made three important changes to Mac OS X and the File Quarantine system. First, it included a definition to detect two Mac Defender variants, OSX.MacDefender.A and OSX.MacDefender.B. Users downloading either of these variants will be warned when the trojan is downloaded and begins to install.

Known malware in the File Quarantine blacklist include:
  • OSX.RSPlug.A
  • OSX.Iservice
  • OSX.HellRTS
  • OSX.OpinionSpy
  • OSX.MacDefender.A
  • OSX.MacDefender.B
  • OSX.MacDefender.C

Second, it changed the way malware definitions are updated. Before Tuesday, Apple only updated this file occasionally with OS updates or security patches. For instance, a definition for OSX.OpinionSpy was added to the definitions list by the Mac OS X 10.6.7 update.

Now, your Mac will by default check for an updated definitions list daily, and automatically download those updates when available. You can turn this feature off in the Security pane of System Preferences if you prefer, but you’ll only get updates to the file when you install future system updates or security patches.

Third, Mac OS X can now detect Mac Defender running on your system and remove it. “If MacDefender malware is found,” according to Apple, “the system will quit this malware, delete any persistent files, and correct any modifications made to configuration or login files.” Admin users will get a notification that it was removed on their next login.

Apple’s response to growing malware threat

The improved File Quarantine system and the added Mac Defender removal feature are surely a welcome response to the increasing problem of this trojan. However, as noted by ZDNet, approximately eight hours after Apple pushed out the patch to tackle Mac Defender, malware authors had a version out in the wild that could bypass the new protections. It seems Apple has joined a classic cat-and-mouse game with malware authors.

The question is, does Apple really want to play this game? And how long can it keep up?

When Mac Defender first appeared, the threat was considered very low because it originally required an admin password to install. That added an additional barrier that it was believed would prevent most users from installing the software, which ironically masqueraded as real antivirus software. The trojan would then throw up numerous fake “virus detected” warnings in an attempt to scare unsuspecting users into sending a registration payment over an unsecured online payment system.

However, Apple Geniuses and third-party service technicians told Ars that Mac Defender and its variants were becoming a problem for an increasing number of users. Later, malware authors developed a version of the software that did away with the admin-password requirements, installing directly into a user’s own separate Applications folder.

While that would prevent access to other users’ data, it could still send up fake virus-infection notifications that could scare the user into “registering” the software. Those who ponied up the $40 or so handed over their credit card information to a group of ne’er-do-wells.

Apple originally took the tack of ignoring the growing Mac Defender problem, but last week the company made a public acknowledgement of the situation and offered a support document that explained how users could get rid of the trojan. It also promised a security patch that could automatically detect and eliminate the malware.

Apple made good on that promise with Tuesday’s update. But now the company will continually have to look for variants and quickly update its malware blacklist if it wants to stay on its current path.

This is something that AV vendors have been doing for years, but Apple (so far) doesn’t have a track record for speed when it comes to such matters. It took Apple nearly 10 months to update the definitions file for OSX.OpinionSpy; it took the company 22 days to even acknowledge the Mac Defender was a problem.

It took Apple at least 24 hours to respond to the new variant of Mac Defender, dubbed OSX.MacDefender.C, judging by the publication time of an article about the update by Italian blog Spider-Mac. We were able to verify that the definitions had been updated by checking the file online, but our local machine had not yet updated the definitions file locally. (The actual timestamp of the file can’t be checked unless your machine has updated the file locally.)

One consequence of the way Apple’s 24 hour automatic updating is that depending on when your machine checks for an update and when Apple publishes it to its servers, you might have to wait until 23:59 before you have the updated definitions on your machine.

Apple continually touts the fact that Mac OS X suffers from few, if any, malware infections, especially scary “PC viruses.” But that may be changing. Security researcher Charlie Miller, known for his repeat Pwn2Own wins targeting Macs, reminds us that Mac OS X isn’t necessarily more secure than other operating systems, particularly when it comes to the kind of social engineering that makes malware such a problem.

“[Mac OS X] has vulnerabilities, and it will let you download and run malware,” Miller told Ars recently. “The difference is that there simply isn’t that much malware written for it. The bad guys have focused all their energies at Windows however, as market share for Macs continues to inch up, that equation is going to change and bad guys will begin to focus in on Macs. When the bad guys decide to go after them with gusto, it’ll get ugly fast.”

Though Apple touts Mac OS X’s security advantage, the company still recommends using antivirus software.

“The Mac is designed with built-in technologies that provide protection against malicious software and security threats right out of the box,” advises the Mac OS X Security page on Apple’s website. “However, since no system can be 100 percent immune from every threat, antivirus software may offer additional protection.”

That may be good advice for a growing number of users, especially those in networked environments or those who lack the technical savvy to avoid the bad stuff.

While Apple’s File Quarantine solution identifies just five known malware threats, and only removes one of them, antivirus software can scan e-mail attachments for Mac or Windows malware, preventing users from inadvertently spreading them to coworkers, colleagues, and friends. And vendors like Intego have a reputation for updating definitions files shortly after new malware is identified.

If Apple can’t take over for more traditional AV vendors and security researchers, though, iOS and the Mac App Store may provide clues to how Apple may deal with the malware problem in future versions of Mac OS X.

Apple’s iOS is essentially a closed ecosystem, where software can only be installed via the App Store. Applications must be digitally signed by the developer, and iOS will refuse to install or run software that is modified in any way. Apple further randomly checks applications submitted to the App Store to make sure they don’t gather user data or perform other nefarious tricks.

The Mac App Store is essentially the same setup, except for Mac OS X. Applications are digitally signed, and Mac OS X could refuse to run them if the software is modified on the way to the user. Users can still install software from any source on Mac OS X, and we believe Apple won’t eliminate that ability any time soon (if ever).

But perhaps Lion or another future version could be configured to only install and run software acquired via the Mac App Store (you know, for the paranoid types). While most advanced users wouldn’t stand for such limitations, less sophisticated users may be willing to only get software from the Mac App Store, especially if Apple could guarantee increased security.

Photo illustration by Chris Foresman

Most Recent Post

MORE ON ARCHIVE
Widget by Mad Tomato

Help Me Expose This Article in Bulk!

Bookmark & Share

- OR -

SELECT YOUR PREFERRED ONE:

Bookmark and Share